VS

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (95 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (16,800 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van or Renault Clio?

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van

  • marginally cheaper
details

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Fiorino Qubo Van

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is marginally cheaper – starting at 16,800 £ , while the Renault Clio costs 17,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 278 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers markedly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 95 HP. That’s roughly 63 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van takes 11.9 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van delivers only slightly more torque with 200 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Renault Clio offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is only slightly lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,285 kg. The difference is around 83 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van carries slightly more – 535 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 72 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van

The Fiat Qubo van is a compact urban workhorse that hides an impressively practical load area behind deceptively small proportions, making tight city streets and parking a breeze. It’s not flashy, but its sensible layout, easy-to-live-with character and wallet-friendly running make it a solid pick for anyone needing dependable everyday practicality without fuss.

details
serpimg_a22BOG

Reviews Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Clio
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Comparing the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza means choosing between two of Europe's most capable superminis: the Clio leans stylish and comfortable, while the Ibiza focuses on sharp handling and value. This quick head-to-head will highlight differences in driving feel, space, efficiency and …
Hyundai i10
Renault Clio
VS
The Hyundai i10 is a pocket-sized urban pro — cheeky on fuel, effortless to park and surprisingly roomy for its class, ideal if your daily grind is dodging bollards and squeezing into parallel spaces. The Renault Clio, by contrast, plays the grown-up card with sharper styling, a nicer interior and …
Renault Clio
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Clio and Yaris are two of Europe’s most popular superminis, each offering smart urban agility and efficient engines. Choosing between the Clio and Yaris comes down to whether you want the Clio’s stylish cabin and sharper handling or the Yaris’s proven reliability and hybrid efficiency.
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Nissan Juke
Renault Clio
VS
The Nissan Juke and Renault Clio compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
The MG3 and Clio are both small hatchbacks aimed at buyers wanting an affordable, city-friendly car, but they take different approaches to style, equipment and driving character. This comparison looks at where the MG3’s value-focused simplicity stacks up against the Clio’s sharper handling, nicer …
Renault Clio
Renault Mégane
VS
Choosing between the Renault Clio and the Renault Mégane is really a choice between a compact city hatchback and a roomier family-oriented hatch. I’ll compare space, driving dynamics, fuel efficiency and running costs to help you pick the better fit for your needs.
Honda Jazz
Renault Clio
VS
The Honda Jazz and Renault Clio are two of the most sensible superminis on the market, but they take different approaches: the Jazz prioritises unbeatable interior flexibility, practicality and reliability, while the Clio focuses on style, sharper handling and up-to-date cabin tech. Which suits you …
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
16,800 - 17,100 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
133 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
3
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,285 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
3,957 mm
Length
-
Width
1,716 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
1,721 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,500 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
535 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
80 - 95 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.9 - 13.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
162 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 200 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
59 - 70 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,248 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2016
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Renault
Is the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van offered with different drivetrains?

The Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.