VS

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (95 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (16,800 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van or Mazda CX-30?

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van

  • considerably cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • a bit lighter
details

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Fiorino Qubo Van

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is considerably cheaper – starting at 16,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,926 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van uses 5.1 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers considerably more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 95 HP. That’s roughly 91 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van takes 11.9 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-30 delivers slightly more torque with 240 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-30 offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van is a bit lighter – 1,285 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 170 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van carries barely more – 535 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,700
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van

The Fiat Qubo van is a compact urban workhorse that hides an impressively practical load area behind deceptively small proportions, making tight city streets and parking a breeze. It’s not flashy, but its sensible layout, easy-to-live-with character and wallet-friendly running make it a solid pick for anyone needing dependable everyday practicality without fuss.

details

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
Fiat Fiorino Qubo Van
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption

Price
16,800 - 17,100 £
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
133 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
3
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,285 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
3,957 mm
Length
-
Width
1,716 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
1,721 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,500 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
535 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
80 - 95 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.9 - 13.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
162 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 200 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
59 - 70 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1,248 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2016
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.