VS

Honda HR-V vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (131 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (29,700 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda HR-V or Mazda CX-30?

Honda HR-V vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

Honda HR-V

4.3 (15 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more efficient
  • very slightly lighter
details

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

HR-V

Honda HR-V vs. Mazda CX-30: An In-Depth Comparison

In the fiercely competitive compact SUV market, the Honda HR-V and Mazda CX-30 stand out for their unique characteristics and innovations. Both vehicles appeal to consumers looking for efficiency, style, and versatility. This article will delve into their technical specifications, features, and innovations to help potential buyers make an informed choice.

CX-30

Engine Performance and Variants

The Honda HR-V comes equipped with a full hybrid engine, delivering a respectable 130 HP and a torque output of 253 Nm. Powered by a 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine, it offers a smooth drive with its continuously variable transmission (CVT) and front-wheel drive setup. The HR-V achieves a 0-100 km/h acceleration in approximately 10.6 seconds, making it a reliable option for daily commuting.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 boasts a variety of engine options, with the top variant producing an impressive 186 HP from a 2.5-liter engine, while a more fuel-efficient version offers 140 HP from a 2.0-liter engine. This range provides buyers with flexibility, allowing them to choose performance levels that suit their driving style. The CX-30 accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds, showcasing its sporty nature.

HR-V

Fuel Efficiency and Consumption

When it comes to fuel consumption, the Honda HR-V shines with a combined rating of just 5.4 L/100km, making it an economical choice for eco-conscious buyers. With a CO2 output of 122 g/km and a fuel tank capacity of 40 liters, the HR-V strikes a functional balance between performance and sustainability.

The Mazda CX-30, with its petrol MHEV engines, consumes between 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, depending on the variant. While this is a bit higher compared to the HR-V, it still offers reasonable efficiency, particularly in the city. The CX-30's larger fuel tank of up to 51 liters allows for extended driving range, especially on longer trips.

CX-30

Dimensions and Practicality

In terms of size, the Honda HR-V measures 4340 mm in length and stands 1582 mm tall, providing a spacious interior for five passengers. The trunk capacity ranges between 320 to 335 liters, which is adequate for everyday needs.

The Mazda CX-30 slightly edges out in terms of dimensions, measuring 4395 mm long and 1795 mm wide. Its trunk capacity of 422 to 430 liters adds practicality, making it better suited for those requiring extra cargo space without compromising passenger comfort.

HR-V

Suspension and Driving Dynamics

Both SUVs prioritize driving comfort, but they adopt different philosophies. The Honda HR-V employs a more traditional approach with a strut front suspension that offers a balanced ride over various terrains. However, some drivers may find it less engaging in spirited driving compared to the Mazda.

The Mazda CX-30 leverages its engineering pedigree, offering a front-wheel-drive setup with optional all-wheel drive. Its finely-tuned suspension system provides excellent handling and a sportier ride, making it a joy to drive on winding roads. This aspect lends the CX-30 a competitive edge in terms of driving dynamics and enjoyment.

CX-30

Interior and Technology

Inside the Honda HR-V, the focus is on practicality and comfort, with user-friendly technology like a decent infotainment system featuring standard smartphone integration. The layout is clean and intuitive, providing a solid driving experience for families and individuals alike.

The Mazda CX-30 elevates the interior experience with its premium materials and sophisticated design. It features a larger infotainment display and a more refined audio system, marking a noticeable difference in craftsmanship. Moreover, its advanced safety features, such as adaptive cruise control and blind-spot monitoring, make it more appealing to safety-conscious consumers.

HR-V

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Choosing between the Honda HR-V and Mazda CX-30 ultimately depends on individual priorities. If fuel efficiency, practicality, and a comfortable ride are your top considerations, the HR-V is a commendable choice. Conversely, if you value performance, sophisticated interior design, and sporty dynamics, the Mazda CX-30 captures the essence of an enjoyable driving experience.

Both vehicles reflect their brands' commitment to quality and innovation, making either a sound investment for those seeking a compact SUV.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

HR-V

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 is slightly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Honda HR-V costs 29,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,508 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda HR-V uses 5.4 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers visibly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Honda HR-V takes 10.6 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda HR-V delivers very slightly more torque with 253 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 13 Nm more.

HR-V

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda HR-V is very slightly lighter – 1,452 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 3 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers clearly more boot space – 430 L compared to 319 L. That’s a difference of about 111 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries slightly more – 496 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Honda HR-V

The Honda HR-V is the sensible compact crossover that blends roomy practicality with a composed, friendly drive, making it an easy pick for buyers who want everyday usability without fuss. It won’t thrill hardcore enthusiasts, but its clever packaging, comfortable cabin and low-key styling make life simpler — and that’s exactly the point.

details

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption

Price
29,700 - 35,400 £
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
122 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,452 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
319 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
-
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
418 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
131 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 - 10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
253 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
96 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Honda
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.