Compare performance (340 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or Nissan Interstar?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Explorer EV is barely cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 36,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,959 £.
As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV offers markedly more range – reaching up to 602 km, about 192 km more than the Nissan Interstar.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Explorer EV offers significantly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Explorer EV delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 299 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Explorer EV offers more seats – 5 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Explorer EV is marginally lighter – 1,996 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 57 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries clearly more – 1,447 kg compared to 585 kg. That’s a difference of about 862 kg.
The Ford Explorer EV stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.
detailsThe Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
|
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
|
Electric Range
410 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 205 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
|
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
531 - 585 kg
|
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Nissan
|