Compare performance (340 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 34,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or smart #3?
As the automotive industry rapidly shifts towards electrification, two notable contenders have emerged in the SUV segment: the Ford Explorer EV and the smart #3. Both vehicles promise innovation and performance in their own right, but how do they measure up against each other? Let's delve into the technical aspects and unique features of each model.
The Ford Explorer EV is powered by a robust electric setup, offering two variations with power outputs of 286 HP and 340 HP. It features both rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, ensuring versatility in driving conditions. With a rapid acceleration time of just 5.3 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h and a maximum speed of 180 km/h, the Explorer EV delivers impressive performance standards expected in modern SUVs.
In contrast, the smart #3 stands out with its high-performance variant producing an impressive 428 HP. This model also offers the option of rear-wheel and all-wheel drive. With a stunning 0 to 100 km/h acceleration in only 3.7 seconds, the #3 undoubtedly appeals to those seeking a sportier drive. Its maximum speed also matches the Explorer EV at 180 km/h, showcasing both models as capable contenders in terms of speed.
The Explorer EV offers a range of battery options with capacities up to 79 kWh, allowing for an electric range of up to 602 km. This makes it highly appealing for long-distance travel with fewer charging stops required. Additionally, its consumption varies between 13.9 and 16.6 kWh/100km, showcasing efficient energy use.
In comparison, the smart #3's battery capacities reach up to 62 kWh, translating to an electric range of approximately 455 km at best. While its efficiency is commendable with consumption figures between 16.3 and 17.6 kWh/100km, it does fall short against the high range capabilities of the Explorer EV, making the Ford a more suitable option for those with greater mileage needs.
Space is key in the SUV market, and the Ford Explorer EV shines in this department with an accommodating trunk capacity of 450 liters. With five seating arrangements in a generous interior, it caters well to families and adventurers alike.
The smart #3 meanwhile features a trunk capacity of 370 liters, which, while adequate for daily use, may not match the generous storage of its Ford counterpart. Both models comfortably seat five passengers, but the Explorer EV edges ahead with its larger dimensions, providing a more spacious feel overall for occupants.
When it comes to technology, both vehicles are equipped with the latest electric vehicle innovations. The Ford Explorer EV features advanced safety systems, driver-assistance technologies, and a robust infotainment system designed to enhance the driving experience. Its layout includes cutting-edge digital displays and smart connectivity options.
The smart #3, on the other hand, doesn't fall behind either. With an innovative user interface and a strong emphasis on connectivity features, it lays out a tech-savvy environment for drivers. However, some critics point out that the overall feel may carry more of a compact vehicle ambiance, despite its SUV classification.
In conclusion, the Ford Explorer EV and smart #3 each offer compelling propositions in the electric SUV space. If you're prioritizing long-range travel, spacious interiors, and overall performance, the Ford Explorer EV emerges as a clear winner. However, if you are seeking a sportier drive with striking acceleration and a modern urban design, the smart #3 secures its place as a solid alternative.
Ultimately, the choice between these two electric SUVs will depend on your specific needs and preferences, but both vehicles contribute to an exciting era of sustainable driving.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Explorer EV is very slightly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the smart #3 costs 34,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 505 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Explorer EV is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 16.3 kWh/100km for the smart #3. That’s a difference of about 1.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV offers clearly more range – reaching up to 602 km, about 147 km more than the smart #3.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 offers noticeably more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 88 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.7 s, while the Ford Explorer EV takes 5.3 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Explorer EV delivers a bit more torque with 679 Nm compared to 584 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, smart #3 is moderately lighter – 1,780 kg compared to 1,996 kg. The difference is around 216 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Explorer EV offers noticeably more boot space – 472 L compared to 370 L. That’s a difference of about 102 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Explorer EV carries clearly more – 585 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.
The smart #3 is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Explorer EV translates the familiar big‑American SUV presence into whisper‑quiet electric motoring, offering roomy seating and a tech‑forward cabin that will please families and road‑trippers alike. It drives with more composure than its boxy looks suggest, blending a comfortable ride and eager acceleration while undercutting the guilt of gas stops — a practical, modern alternative for buyers who want Explorer space with electric charm.
details
The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 48,800 £
|
Price
34,700 - 45,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 - 17.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
|
Electric Range
325 - 455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
47 - 62 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
|
Curb weight
1,780 - 1,910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,400 mm
|
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
Width
1,844 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,556 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,160 L
|
|
Payload
531 - 585 kg
|
Payload
419 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 584 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,026
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
smart
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España