VS

Ford Kuga vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Mazda CX-80?

Ford Kuga vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • noticeably lighter

Mazda CX-80

  • clearly more power
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Kuga is considerably cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,086 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Kuga offers a bit more range – reaching up to 68 km, about 8 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 84 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 310 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is noticeably lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 605 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries a bit more – 650 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 100 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Ford Kuga
Ford Capri
VS
The Ford Kuga is the modern, family-ready compact SUV — sensible, tech-savvy and built for school runs, weekend getaways and minimal fuss. The Ford Capri is the cheeky classic coupe: a slice of retro charisma and driver-focused flair that trades boot space and back seats for pure personality.
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.

details
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0085-LOW
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0238-LOW
FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_PHEV_024-LOW

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Peugeot 3008
VS
The Ford Kuga is the all-rounder that hustles through bends with eager steering and practical space to spare, while the Peugeot 3008 plays the style card with a plush, sculpted interior and a calmer, more refined ride. Pick the Kuga if you want driving engagement and value, choose the 3008 if cabin …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Kuga
VS
Citroën C5 Aircross pampers occupants with pillowy seats, a supremely comfortable ride and playful French styling, while the Ford Kuga answers with sharper handling, classier tech and a more engaging range of engines. If you value long‑distance plushness, pick the Aircross; if you want a sportier …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Ford Focus
Ford Kuga
VS
The Ford Focus is the sharp, pocket-sized hatchback that rewards anyone who enjoys direct steering, low running costs and a sporty feel on twisty roads, while the Ford Kuga trades that agility for a higher driving position, roomier cabin and SUV practicality that suits families and weekend …
Ford Kuga
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Ford Kuga drives with a bit more panache—sharper steering, punchier engines and the kind of gadgetry that makes motorway miles fly by—while the Skoda Karoq quietly wins hearts with sensible packaging, excellent practicality and the sort of roominess that swallows weekend luggage without …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Ford Kuga
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible compact SUV — roomy, practical and built for real-world family duties rather than showpieces, making it an easy buy if you need reliability and space. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a swooping, tech-heavy concept car: brilliant to admire and full of futuristic …
Ford Kuga
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Ford Kuga and Renault Austral stand out with their distinctive designs and advanced technology. The Kuga impresses with its dynamic driving experience and strong performance, while the Austral offers a comfortable ride with an emphasis on eco-friendly …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Ford Kuga?

The Ford Kuga is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.