Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Kuga vs Mercedes EQA – Differences & prices compared
Kuga
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Kuga has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £, while the Mercedes EQA costs 44200 £. That’s a price difference of around 9995 £.
As for range, the Mercedes EQA performs significantly better – achieving up to 561 km, about 493 km more than the Ford Kuga.
EQA
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA has a a bit edge – offering 292 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 49 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQA is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.30 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Kuga performs to a small extent better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Mercedes EQA tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQA pulls decisively stronger with 520 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 280 Nm difference.
Kuga
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Kuga is clearly perceptible lighter – 1526 kg compared to 2045 kg. The difference is around 519 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Kuga offers somewhat more room – 412 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 72 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Kuga performs somewhat better – up to 1534 L, which is about 214 L more than the Mercedes EQA.
When it comes to payload, Ford Kuga evident takes the win – 550 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Mercedes EQA shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
Ford Kuga
Mercedes EQA
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £44,200
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes EQA
Ford Kuga
3.5 (2 Reviews)
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Mercedes EQA
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
details
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Ford Kuga
Mercedes EQA
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 46300 £
|
Price
44200 - 57400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
70.50 kWh
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
|
Curb weight
2045 - 2115 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
412 L
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
|
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
|
Length
4463 mm
|
|
Width
1882 mm
|
Width
1834 mm
|
|
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
|
Height
1608 - 1613 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1320 L
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
What drivetrain options does the Ford Kuga have?
The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.