Ford Kuga vs Nissan Qashqai - Differences and prices compared

Q: What is the maximum horsepower of the Ford Kuga?

Up to 243 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: How much fuel does the Ford Kuga use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 2.80 L.

Q: What is the electric driving range of the Ford Kuga?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 68 km.

Q: How large is the Ford Kuga’s battery?

The Ford Kuga comes with a 14.40 kWh battery.

Q: What maximum speed does the Ford Kuga reach?

The Ford Kuga reaches up to 200 km/h.

Q: What are the Ford Kuga’s length, width and height?

Length 4604 mm, width 1882 mm, height 1675 mm – those are the dimensions of the Ford Kuga.

Q: Is the Nissan Qashqai offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

Q: How much power does the Nissan Qashqai deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the Nissan Qashqai delivers up to 205 HP.

Q: How much fuel does the Nissan Qashqai use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 4.50 L.

Compare performance (243 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 29600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Nissan Qashqai?

scroll down

Kuga

Comparing the Ford Kuga and Nissan Qashqai: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

In the ever-evolving landscape of compact SUVs, the Ford Kuga and the Nissan Qashqai stand out as two prominent contenders. Both vehicles have undergone significant updates in the 2024 model year, featuring advanced technologies, various powertrains, and sleek designs. Let's dive into the technical specifications and innovative features of these two SUVs to determine which one best matches your needs.

Qashqai

Powertrain and Performance

The Ford Kuga offers a diverse array of engine types, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid options. With power outputs ranging from 150 to 243 HP and a 0-100 km/h acceleration time as brisk as 7.3 seconds, the Kuga promises robust performance for its class. Notably, the plug-in hybrid variant delivers an impressive electric range of 69 km, courtesy of a 14.4 kWh battery.

On the other hand, the Nissan Qashqai provides petrol mild hybrid and full hybrid options. With power outputs ranging from 140 to 190 HP, the Qashqai achieves a decent acceleration, with the best 0-100 km/h timing at 7.9 seconds. Its peak torque of 330 Nm, however, lends the Qashqai a responsive and energetic driving experience, ideal for every urban setting.

scroll down

Kuga

Efficiency and Environment

In terms of efficiency, the Ford Kuga's plug-in hybrid version stands out with a consumption rate as low as 0.9 L/100km and a mere 20 g/km of CO2 emissions. This makes it an attractive choice for eco-conscious drivers. Other Kuga variants maintain competitive efficiency levels, with consumption ranging between 5.3 and 6.4 L/100km, depending on the powertrain.

The Nissan Qashqai exhibits commendable efficiency with a consumption rate between 5.1 and 6.8 L/100km, and CO2 emissions from 116 to 154 g/km. Despite this, the Qashqai's CO2 efficiency classes mainly stay in the 'E' and 'D' categories, slightly lagging behind the Kuga's best-in-class figures.

Qashqai

Interior and Cargo Space

Both vehicles offer ample space for five passengers, but when it comes to cargo, the Nissan Qashqai takes the lead with a trunk capacity of up to 504 liters, compared to the Ford Kuga's 412 liters. This makes the Qashqai particularly appealing for those who frequently need to transport larger items or luggage.

Kuga

Dimensions and Design

Ford's Kuga exhibits a more substantial presence with its length extending up to 4,645 mm. It stands slightly taller with a height reaching up to 1,681 mm and offers wider spacing at 1,882 mm. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai measures a little more compact with a length of 4,425 mm, a more modest height of 1,625 mm, and a width of 1,835 mm. These dimensions indicate that the Kuga might provide more comfort for larger passengers, while the Qashqai's more compact design enhances its maneuverability in tight spaces.

Qashqai

Final Thoughts

Choosing between the Ford Kuga and Nissan Qashqai hinges on your personal preferences and priorities. For those prioritizing environmental considerations and electric range, the Kuga's plug-in hybrid version is an excellent choice. However, if practicality, cargo space, and torque are at the top of your wishlist, then the Nissan Qashqai emerges as a strong contender.

The decision ultimately comes down to balancing your need for performance, efficiency, and utility. Both SUVs encapsulate what modern drivers seek, making either a worthy addition to the family driveway.

Ford Kuga

4.3 (5 Reviews)

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Qashqai has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29600 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4637 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Kuga manages with 2.80 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 4.50 L. The difference is about 1.70 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga has a slightly edge – offering 243 HP compared to 205 HP. That’s roughly 38 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Nissan Qashqai takes 7.60 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Nissan Qashqai performs slight better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Ford Kuga tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Qashqai pulls evident stronger with 330 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is slight lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1526 kg. The difference is around 106 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers a bit more room – 504 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 92 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Kuga performs minimal better – up to 1534 L, which is about 87 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.

When it comes to payload, Ford Kuga hardly perceptible takes the win – 550 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Kuga is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Ford Kuga

Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Price

Consumption L/100km

co2

Fuel tank capacity

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Power HP

Acceleration 0-100km/h

Max Speed

Torque

Number of Cylinders

Power kW

Engine capacity

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Seats

Curb weight

Trunk capacity

Max trunk capacity

Payload

from about £34,200

Ford Kuga

Price : 34200 - 46300 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail : Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 150 - 243 HP
Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 6.8 L
Electric Range : 68 km
Battery Capacity : 1.1 - 14.4 kWh
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 7.3 - 9.9 s
Model Year : 2025
Max Speed : 195 - 200 km/h
Torque : 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders : 3 - 4
Doors : 5
Model : Kuga
Modell : Kuga 1.5 EcoBoost, Kuga 2.5 FHEV, Kuga 2.5 PHEV, Kuga Active X 1.5 EcoBoost, Kuga Active X 2.5 FHEV, Kuga Active X 2.5 PHEV
CO2 Efficiency Class : E, D, B
Trim Level : Titanium, ST-Line, ST-Line X, Sound Edition, Titanium CVT, Titanium Allrad CVT, ST-Line CVT, ST-Line Allrad CVT, ST-Line X CVT, ST-Line X Allrad CVT, Sound Edition CVT, Sound Edition Allrad CVT, Titanium Automatik, ST-Line Automatik, ST-Line X Automatik, Sound Edition Automatik, CVT, Allrad CVT, Automatik
Power kW : 111 - 178 kW
co2 : 55 - 154 g/km
Engine capacity : 1496 - 2488 cm3
Curb weight : 1526 - 1859 kg
Fuel tank capacity : 42 - 54 L
Trunk capacity : 412 L
Length : 4604 - 4645 mm
Width : 1882 mm
Height : 1673 - 1681 mm
Brand : Ford
Max trunk capacity : 1534 L
Payload : 541 - 550 kg

details

Ford Kuga

4.3 (5 Reviews)

The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.

details

ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0085-LOW

ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0238-LOW

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)

The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.

details

Top Car Comparisons

Nissan Qashqai

VW T-Roc

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …

Nissan Qashqai

Volvo XC40

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …

Ford Kuga

Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption
Price 34200 - 46300 £	Price 29600 - 39900 £
Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 6.8 L	Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 6.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 68 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 1.1 - 14.4 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 55 - 154 g/km	co2 102 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 42 - 54 L	Fuel tank capacity 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1526 - 1859 kg	Curb weight 1420 - 1665 kg
Trunk capacity 412 L	Trunk capacity 479 - 504 L
Length 4604 - 4645 mm	Length 4425 mm
Width 1882 mm	Width 1835 mm
Height 1673 - 1681 mm	Height 1625 mm
Max trunk capacity 1534 L	Max trunk capacity 1422 - 1447 L
Payload 541 - 550 kg	Payload 466 - 520 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 243 HP	Power HP 140 - 205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.3 - 9.9 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.6 - 10.2 s
Max Speed 195 - 200 km/h	Max Speed 170 - 206 km/h
Torque 240 Nm	Torque 240 - 330 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3 - 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 111 - 178 kW	Power kW 103 - 151 kW
Engine capacity 1496 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity 1332 - 1498 cm3