VS

Ford Kuga vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Renault Arkana?

Ford Kuga vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kuga

Ford Kuga vs. Renault Arkana: A Compelling SUV Showdown

In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, two contenders have emerged that marry style, practicality, and technology: the 2024 Ford Kuga and the 2023-2024 Renault Arkana. While both vehicles fall under the SUV category, they bring unique characteristics and innovations to the table, especially in terms of engine variety, drivetrain options, and performance metrics. This comparison delves deeper into what makes each of these models a compelling choice for prospective buyers.

Arkana

Engine Options and Performance Capabilities

The Ford Kuga offers a versatile engine lineup, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid variants. Whether you're interested in a manual gearbox or the smooth transitions of a CVT, the Kuga covers both bases. The power output ranges from 150 to an impressive 243 HP, with a top speed stretching up to 200 km/h and acceleration times from 9.5 to a nimble 7.3 seconds for 0-100 km/h. Additionally, the Kuga's plug-in hybrid model boasts an electric range of up to 69 km, highlighting its emphasis on efficiency.

On the other hand, the Renault Arkana emphasizes a hybrid approach too, offering full hybrid and mild hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) gasoline engines. Producing between 140 and 158 HP, and reaching top speeds of up to 174 km/h, the Arkana provides a dynamic drive. Accelerating from 0-100 km/h between 10.8 to 9.1 seconds, it might not match the rapid acceleration of some Kuga models but offers a balanced performance suitable for city and highway driving.

Kuga

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Considerations

Efficiency is where both vehicles strive to impress. The Ford Kuga shines with a consumption rate as low as 0.9 L/100km in its plug-in hybrid form, backed by a CO2 efficiency class from E to B depending on the model configuration. This makes it an attractive option for environmentally-conscious consumers looking to minimize their carbon footprint.

The Arkana does not trail far behind, with an impressive 4.7 L/100km consumption in its full hybrid variant and CO2 outputs ranging from 106 to 135 g/km. Positioned with CO2 efficiency classes from C to D, the Arkana showcases Renault's commitment to sustainable yet functional vehicles.

Arkana

Design and Practicality

Design plays a crucial role in the buying decision, and both the Kuga and Arkana have an edge in aesthetics with their sleek lines and robust presence. The Ford Kuga spans a length between 4604 to 4645 mm, with a roomy width of 1882 mm and height up to 1681 mm. Its trunk capacity of 412 liters may appear limiting, yet its payload capacity compensates for various transport needs.

The Renault Arkana stands slightly shorter in both length (4568 mm) and height (1576 mm) but boasts a larger trunk volume of up to 513 liters, appealing to those requiring greater cargo space. Its more slender body width of 1821 mm offers a streamlined appearance, making it agile in urban settings.

Kuga

Choosing Between the Two: A Matter of Preference

Deciding between the Ford Kuga and Renault Arkana ultimately depends on personal preferences and driving needs. The Kuga is versatile with a broad engine range and superior hybrid efficiency, ideal for those valuing electric range and power. Meanwhile, the Arkana provides a compelling crossover experience with its efficient design and ample trunk space — appealing to practical yet style-conscious buyers.

Both SUVs embody the advancements in automotive engineering and offer considerable benefits. The choice depends largely on whether hybrid efficiency or a stylish, practical design ranks highest on your new car checklist.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Arkana is visibly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,785 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers clearly more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 100 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Kuga delivers moderately more torque with 240 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is very slightly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,526 kg. The difference is around 16 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries slightly more – 550 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 99 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Kuga is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Kuga

Ford Kuga

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 243 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 68 km
details
Ford Kuga
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.

details
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0085-LOW
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0238-LOW
FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_PHEV_024-LOW

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Ford Kuga drives with a bit more panache—sharper steering, punchier engines and the kind of gadgetry that makes motorway miles fly by—while the Skoda Karoq quietly wins hearts with sensible packaging, excellent practicality and the sort of roominess that swallows weekend luggage without …
Ford Kuga
Peugeot 3008
VS
The Ford Kuga is the all-rounder that hustles through bends with eager steering and practical space to spare, while the Peugeot 3008 plays the style card with a plush, sculpted interior and a calmer, more refined ride. Pick the Kuga if you want driving engagement and value, choose the 3008 if cabin …
Ford Kuga
MG HS
VS
Unsure whether the Ford Kuga or the MG HS is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Kuga
VS
Citroën C5 Aircross pampers occupants with pillowy seats, a supremely comfortable ride and playful French styling, while the Ford Kuga answers with sharper handling, classier tech and a more engaging range of engines. If you value long‑distance plushness, pick the Aircross; if you want a sportier …
Ford Focus
Ford Kuga
VS
The Ford Focus is the sharp, pocket-sized hatchback that rewards anyone who enjoys direct steering, low running costs and a sporty feel on twisty roads, while the Ford Kuga trades that agility for a higher driving position, roomier cabin and SUV practicality that suits families and weekend …
Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana stands out with its sleek coupe-like design, appealing to those who prioritize style alongside functionality. Meanwhile, the Renault Rafale offers a more traditional SUV layout, emphasizing practicality and spaciousness for families and …
Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
Comparing the Renault Arkana and the Renault Captur, both models present unique offerings in the compact SUV category. The Arkana stands out with its coupe-inspired design, providing a sportier profile and an engaging driving experience, ideal for those seeking an adventurous edge. In contrast, the …
Ford Kuga
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Ford Kuga?

The Ford Kuga is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.