@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Renault Group Media
VS

Ford Kuga vs Renault Arkana – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Kuga or Renault Arkana fits your lifestyle better.

Kuga @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Kuga vs. Renault Arkana: A Compelling SUV Showdown

In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, two contenders have emerged that marry style, practicality, and technology: the 2024 Ford Kuga and the 2023-2024 Renault Arkana. While both vehicles fall under the SUV category, they bring unique characteristics and innovations to the table, especially in terms of engine variety, drivetrain options, and performance metrics. This comparison delves deeper into what makes each of these models a compelling choice for prospective buyers.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Engine Options and Performance Capabilities

The Ford Kuga offers a versatile engine lineup, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid variants. Whether you're interested in a manual gearbox or the smooth transitions of a CVT, the Kuga covers both bases. The power output ranges from 150 to an impressive 243 HP, with a top speed stretching up to 200 km/h and acceleration times from 9.5 to a nimble 7.3 seconds for 0-100 km/h. Additionally, the Kuga's plug-in hybrid model boasts an electric range of up to 69 km, highlighting its emphasis on efficiency.

On the other hand, the Renault Arkana emphasizes a hybrid approach too, offering full hybrid and mild hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) gasoline engines. Producing between 140 and 158 HP, and reaching top speeds of up to 174 km/h, the Arkana provides a dynamic drive. Accelerating from 0-100 km/h between 10.8 to 9.1 seconds, it might not match the rapid acceleration of some Kuga models but offers a balanced performance suitable for city and highway driving.

Kuga @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Considerations

Efficiency is where both vehicles strive to impress. The Ford Kuga shines with a consumption rate as low as 0.9 L/100km in its plug-in hybrid form, backed by a CO2 efficiency class from E to B depending on the model configuration. This makes it an attractive option for environmentally-conscious consumers looking to minimize their carbon footprint.

The Arkana does not trail far behind, with an impressive 4.7 L/100km consumption in its full hybrid variant and CO2 outputs ranging from 106 to 135 g/km. Positioned with CO2 efficiency classes from C to D, the Arkana showcases Renault's commitment to sustainable yet functional vehicles.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Design and Practicality

Design plays a crucial role in the buying decision, and both the Kuga and Arkana have an edge in aesthetics with their sleek lines and robust presence. The Ford Kuga spans a length between 4604 to 4645 mm, with a roomy width of 1882 mm and height up to 1681 mm. Its trunk capacity of 412 liters may appear limiting, yet its payload capacity compensates for various transport needs.

The Renault Arkana stands slightly shorter in both length (4568 mm) and height (1576 mm) but boasts a larger trunk volume of up to 513 liters, appealing to those requiring greater cargo space. Its more slender body width of 1821 mm offers a streamlined appearance, making it agile in urban settings.

Kuga @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Choosing Between the Two: A Matter of Preference

Deciding between the Ford Kuga and Renault Arkana ultimately depends on personal preferences and driving needs. The Kuga is versatile with a broad engine range and superior hybrid efficiency, ideal for those valuing electric range and power. Meanwhile, the Arkana provides a compelling crossover experience with its efficient design and ample trunk space — appealing to practical yet style-conscious buyers.

Both SUVs embody the advancements in automotive engineering and offer considerable benefits. The choice depends largely on whether hybrid efficiency or a stylish, practical design ranks highest on your new car checklist.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Arkana has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £, while the Ford Kuga costs 34200 £. That’s a price difference of around 5785 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Kuga manages with 2.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.70 L. The difference is about 1.90 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga has a clearly edge – offering 243 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 100 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 3.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Kuga performs somewhat better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 28 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Kuga pulls somewhat stronger with 240 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Renault Arkana is slight lighter – 1510 kg compared to 1526 kg. The difference is around 16 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Renault Arkana offers somewhat more room – 480 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 68 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Kuga performs to a small extent better – up to 1534 L, which is about 271 L more than the Renault Arkana.

When it comes to payload, Ford Kuga slightly takes the win – 550 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 99 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Kuga proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Kuga is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £34,200
Kuga @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Kuga

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 243 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 6.8 L
  • Electric Range : 68 km

Ford Kuga

3.5 (2)
rate

The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.

details

Renault Arkana

4 (1)
rate

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
Ford Kuga
Renault Arkana
Kuga @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
34200 - 46300 £
Price
28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
Curb weight
1510 kg
Trunk capacity
412 L
Trunk capacity
480 L
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
Length
4568 mm
Width
1882 mm
Width
1821 mm
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
Height
1576 mm
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
Max Speed
172 km/h
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1598 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Ford Kuga have?

The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.