Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Kuga vs Renault Arkana - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (243 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 28500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Renault Arkana?
Kuga
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Arkana has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5785 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Kuga manages with 2.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.70 L. The difference is about 1.90 L per 100 km.
Arkana
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga has a clearly edge – offering 243 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 100 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 3.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Kuga performs somewhat better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 28 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Kuga pulls somewhat stronger with 240 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kuga
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Arkana is slight lighter – 1510 kg compared to 1526 kg. The difference is around 16 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Arkana offers somewhat more room – 480 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 68 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Kuga performs to a small extent better – up to 1534 L, which is about 271 L more than the Renault Arkana.
When it comes to payload, Ford Kuga slightly takes the win – 550 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 99 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Kuga is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Kuga
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £34,200
Ford Kuga
Ford Kuga
4.1 (4 Reviews)
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
Renault Arkana
4 (1 Reviews)
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Ford Kuga
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 46300 £
|
Price
28500 - 31900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
|
Curb weight
1510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
412 L
|
Trunk capacity
480 L
|
|
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
|
Length
4568 mm
|
|
Width
1882 mm
|
Width
1821 mm
|
|
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
|
Height
1576 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
172 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
What drivetrain options does the Ford Kuga have?
The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.