Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Kuga vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (243 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 22400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?
Kuga
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22400 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11802 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Kuga manages with 2.80 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.10 L. The difference is about 2.30 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs significantly better – achieving up to 290 km, about 222 km more than the Ford Kuga.
Kangoo Compact Van
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga has a convincingly edge – offering 243 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 121 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 11.60 s. That’s about 4.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Kuga performs to a small extent better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van tops out at 176 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Kangoo Compact Van pulls to a small extent stronger with 270 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Kuga
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is hardly perceptible lighter – 1493 kg compared to 1526 kg. The difference is around 33 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs clearly better – up to 4900 L, which is about 3366 L more than the Ford Kuga.
When it comes to payload, Renault Kangoo Compact Van clearly perceptible takes the win – 901 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 351 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Renault Kangoo Compact Van holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Kuga
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £22,400
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Ford Kuga
4.1 (4 Reviews)
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
details
Ford Kuga
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 46300 £
|
Price
22400 - 37000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
261 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
|
Curb weight
1493 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
412 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
|
Length
4486 - 4910 mm
|
|
Width
1882 mm
|
Width
1860 mm
|
|
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
|
Height
1854 - 1864 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3000 - 4900 L
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
498 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2022 - 2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
What drivetrain options does the Ford Kuga have?
The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.