VS

Ford Kuga vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?

Ford Kuga vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

  • visibly cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Kangoo Compact Van is visibly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,069 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers clearly more range – reaching up to 284 km, about 216 km more than the Ford Kuga.

Kangoo Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers substantially more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 121 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 12.3 s. That’s about 5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Kangoo Compact Van delivers slightly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is only slightly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,639 kg. The difference is around 113 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries noticeably more – 901 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 351 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Kuga comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Kuga

Ford Kuga

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 243 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 68 km
Ford Kuga
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.

details
Ford Kuga
Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
25,200 - 37,000 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
279 - 284 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
0 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
1,639 - 1,910 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
670 - 901 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
95 - 122 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 14.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
245 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
70 - 90 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.