Compare performance (243 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 25,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Renault Kangoo Compact Van?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van is visibly cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,069 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van offers clearly more range – reaching up to 284 km, about 216 km more than the Ford Kuga.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers substantially more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 121 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 12.3 s. That’s about 5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Kangoo Compact Van delivers slightly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is only slightly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,639 kg. The difference is around 113 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van carries noticeably more – 901 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 351 kg.
The Ford Kuga comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.
details
The Renault Kangoo is a practical, no-nonsense compact van that turns urban deliveries and weekend DIY runs into a surprisingly easy chore. Roomy for its size, comfortable to drive and brimming with smart storage solutions, it’s a sensible pick for anyone who needs honest utility without drama.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
|
Price
25,200 - 37,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.5 - 20.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
279 - 284 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
|
Curb weight
1,639 - 1,910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,882 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
670 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 14.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
245 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|