VS

Ford Kuga vs Renault R4 comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 27,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Renault R4?

Ford Kuga vs Renault R4: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.4 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault R4

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault R4 is visibly cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,917 £.

As for electric range, the Renault R4 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 409 km, about 341 km more than the Ford Kuga.

R4

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers visibly more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 93 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Renault R4 takes 8.2 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault R4 delivers very slightly more torque with 245 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault R4 is barely lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,526 kg. The difference is around 16 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries moderately more – 550 kg compared to 443 kg. That’s a difference of about 107 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault R4 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,300
R4

Renault R4

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 409 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Geely Starray
VS
The Ford Kuga and the Geely Starray present two different takes on the family car: the Kuga is a well-sorted European compact SUV known for composed handling and refinement, while the Starray focuses on roomy, tech-rich cabin space at a very competitive price. I’ll highlight the real-world …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Ford Kuga
Renault R4

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details
2025_FORD_KUGA_BLACK_PACKAGE_01-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_11-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_09-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_04

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.4 (9 Reviews)
rate
Owners tend to see the Kuga as a well‑balanced, good‑value compact SUV that combines efficiency, comfort and confident driving dynamics. Common positives mention strong fuel economy (notably in plug‑in use), a practical, comfortable interior and a reliable feel, while recurring negatives include winter ventilation/window‑fogging, a sometimes firmer ride on rough roads, a boot a few owners would like slightly larger, and occasional limits reported on PHEV charging. These comments come from owners using the car for commuting, family and leisure, so they reflect everyday ownership impressions rather than formal testing.
Peter
7 Sept 2026, 13:55:49

Really nice car, very well equipped and with crisp handling. Roomy, well laid-out and comfortable. I must say I'm an avid Ford enthusiast (now my 12th Ford). I've driven many brands, but I always end up back at Ford. I also previously had a Kuga.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Christer
19 Aug 2026, 13:48:32

I have a 2016 sedan, new, 180 hp diesel, Business Edition with full leather, sunroof and other frills. From a comfortable and quick highway workhorse to a safe ride in 20 cm of snow/off-road. Suspension is a bit too firm for gravel-road potholes. No rust, cheap spare parts; I've only replaced brake discs/pads, an ABS sensor and the timing belt. Smooth DSG gearbox, large trunk, 1.6 cubic meters with the rear seats folded. A reliable companion in all weather!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marek
15 Jun 2026, 07:10:36

A very sensible car — I like how it looks, it’s well put together, economical on fuel, the interior is comfortable and fairly traditional without any gimmicks, excellent handling, the performance is really good despite it being a large and heavy car; the trunk could be a bit bigger, but it’s still fine — roomy and generally sufficient for family trips, and above all, so far the car has been reliable.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Renault R4

The Renault R4, affectionately known as the "R4," is a quintessential symbol of French automotive simplicity and practicality. This classic compact car, originally introduced in the early 1960s, won over numerous enthusiasts with its versatile design and dependable performance. Its no-frills charm and robust build made it a beloved choice for rural drivers and city dwellers alike, cementing its status as an iconic piece of automotive history.

details
R-DAM_1606030
R-DAM_1606039
R-DAM_1605976

Reviews Renault R4

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Renault R4
Skoda Epiq
VS
This comparison pits the Renault R4 against the Skoda Epiq, helping you choose between Renault’s compact, characterful offering and Skoda’s modern, tech-focused alternative. I’ll focus on the things that matter in real ownership—space, driving feel, efficiency and running costs—so you can see which …
Ford Kuga
Jaecoo 7
VS
The Ford Kuga and Jaecoo 7 are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want space and practicality, but they represent contrasting approaches: the Kuga focuses on refined driving dynamics, safety pedigree and a mature dealer network, while the Jaecoo 7 competes with bold styling, generous equipment and …
CUPRA Formentor
Ford Kuga
VS
The Cupra Formentor and the Ford Kuga are two popular compact SUVs that take very different approaches: the Formentor prioritises sporty driving dynamics and striking design, while the Kuga focuses on comfort, practicality and efficient powertrains. This comparison will cover performance, interior …
Kia EV3
Renault R4
VS
Think of the Kia EV3 as the sharp, efficient newcomer — punchy range, clean interior and contemporary tech that suits commuters wanting sensible electric daily transport — while the Renault 4 is a lovable throwback: quirky styling, simple practicality and urban charm that puts a smile on every …
Ford Kuga
MG HS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG HS are popular compact SUVs that appeal to buyers after roomy cabins and practical everyday driving — the Kuga leans toward sharper handling and more refined powertrain options, while the MG HS focuses on strong value and generous standard kit. This comparison cuts through the …
Renault R4
Kia EV2
VS
This is a practical head-to-head between the Renault R4 and the Kia EV2, two compact electric models aimed at affordable, efficient urban mobility. I’ll compare their driving feel, range, interior space and ownership costs to help you decide which one fits your daily needs best.
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
Ford Kuga
Renault R4

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
27,300 - 32,800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
409 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
1,510 - 1,537 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
420 - 1,045 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,808 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
385 - 443 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
110 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Ford Kuga?

The Ford Kuga is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.