VS

Ford Kuga vs Rolls-Royce Phantom comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 571 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 445,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Rolls-Royce Phantom?

Ford Kuga vs Rolls-Royce Phantom: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Phantom

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Kuga is significantly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Phantom costs 445,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 411,472 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Phantom with 15.5 L/100km. The difference is about 12.7 L/100km.

Phantom

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Phantom offers clearly more power – delivering 571 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 328 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Phantom is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Phantom delivers substantially more torque with 900 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 660 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is clearly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 2,560 kg. The difference is around 1,034 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries a bit more – 550 kg compared to 440 kg. That’s a difference of about 110 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Kuga is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Kuga

Ford Kuga

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 243 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 68 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Ford Kuga
Ford Explorer EV
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Ford Explorer EV means deciding whether you want a compact, efficient SUV with petrol/hybrid options or a larger, fully electric Explorer that prioritizes range, cabin space and advanced tech. I’ll walk through real-world running costs, driving feel, interior …
Ford Kuga
Rolls-Royce Phantom

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details
2025_FORD_KUGA_BLACK_PACKAGE_01-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_11-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_09-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_04

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
Marek
15 Jun 2026, 07:10:36

A very sensible car — I like how it looks, it’s well put together, economical on fuel, the interior is comfortable and fairly traditional without any gimmicks, excellent handling, the performance is really good despite it being a large and heavy car; the trunk could be a bit bigger, but it’s still fine — roomy and generally sufficient for family trips, and above all, so far the car has been reliable.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Rolls-Royce Phantom

The Phantom stands as the epitome of luxury and craftsmanship, effortlessly merging opulence with unparalleled performance. With its iconic design and attention to detail, this flagship sedan commands respect on the road while cocooning its passengers in sumptuous comfort. Every journey in the Phantom is an experience, where timeless elegance meets cutting-edge technology.

details
serpimg_Nvbd2M

Reviews Rolls-Royce Phantom

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible compact SUV — roomy, practical and built for real-world family duties rather than showpieces, making it an easy buy if you need reliability and space. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a swooping, tech-heavy concept car: brilliant to admire and full of futuristic …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
CUPRA Formentor
Ford Kuga
VS
The Cupra Formentor and the Ford Kuga are two popular compact SUVs that take very different approaches: the Formentor prioritises sporty driving dynamics and striking design, while the Kuga focuses on comfort, practicality and efficient powertrains. This comparison will cover performance, interior …
Ford Kuga
Nissan X-Trail
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Nissan X-Trail comes down to whether you prefer a sportier, tech-focused compact SUV or a more spacious, family-oriented and practical option. The Kuga offers sharper handling and up-to-date infotainment, while the X-Trail emphasizes cabin space, comfort and …
Ford Kuga
Geely Starray
VS
The Ford Kuga and the Geely Starray present two different takes on the family car: the Kuga is a well-sorted European compact SUV known for composed handling and refinement, while the Starray focuses on roomy, tech-rich cabin space at a very competitive price. I’ll highlight the real-world …
Ford Kuga
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Ford Kuga and the Toyota Corolla Cross are two popular compact SUVs with distinct priorities — the Kuga leans toward sharper driving dynamics and tech, while the Corolla Cross focuses on practicality, fuel efficiency, and reliability. This comparison will help you weigh space, comfort, economy, …
Ford Focus
Ford Kuga
VS
The Ford Focus is the sharp, pocket-sized hatchback that rewards anyone who enjoys direct steering, low running costs and a sporty feel on twisty roads, while the Ford Kuga trades that agility for a higher driving position, roomier cabin and SUV practicality that suits families and weekend …
Ford Kuga
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Comparing the Ford Kuga and the Suzuki S‑Cross helps you decide between a bigger, more tech-rich family SUV and a compact, practical crossover that’s easier on the wallet. Below is a direct, practical breakdown to help match each car to real-life needs. Quick verdict - Ford Kuga: A more spacious, …
Ford Kuga
Rolls-Royce Phantom

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
445,700 - 514,300 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
15.5 - 15.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
351 - 361 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
2,560 - 2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
548 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
2,018 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
390 - 440 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
571 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
420 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2022
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Rolls-Royce
What drive types are available for the Ford Kuga?

The Ford Kuga is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.