VS

Ford Kuga vs Toyota Proace Transporter comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 31,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Toyota Proace Transporter?

Ford Kuga vs Toyota Proace Transporter: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

Toyota Proace Transporter

  • very slightly cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota Proace Transporter is very slightly cheaper – starting at 31,600 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,607 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Toyota Proace Transporter with 6.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota Proace Transporter offers significantly more range – reaching up to 349 km, about 281 km more than the Ford Kuga.

Proace Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers markedly more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 93 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Toyota Proace Transporter takes 12.1 s. That’s about 4.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Proace Transporter delivers clearly more torque with 370 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Toyota Proace Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is very slightly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,656 kg. The difference is around 130 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota Proace Transporter carries considerably more – 1,323 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 773 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota Proace Transporter has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £31,600
Proace Transporter

Toyota Proace Transporter

  • Engine Type Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 120 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.4 - 6.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 23.8 - 23.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 349 km
Ford Kuga
Toyota Proace Transporter

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details

Toyota Proace Transporter

The Toyota Proace Transporter is a no-nonsense work van that pairs Toyota’s dependable reputation with smart practicality, so you can load, drive and finish the job without unnecessary drama. It won’t win design awards, but with a comfortable cab, sensible feature set and a focus on getting things done, it quietly keeps fleets and small businesses smiling.

details
Ford Kuga
Toyota Proace Transporter

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
31,600 - 51,000 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
23.8 - 23.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
349 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
0 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3 - 6
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
1,656 - 2,100 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
955 - 1,323 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
120 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
260 - 370 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
88 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, A, G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Toyota
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.