VS

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (446 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (56,900 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Convertible or Renault Arkana?

Ford Mustang Convertible vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Ford Mustang Convertible

  • substantially more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly lighter
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Convertible

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Arkana is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Ford Mustang Convertible costs 56,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,457 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Ford Mustang Convertible with 12.3 L/100km. The difference is about 7.6 L/100km.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Convertible offers substantially more power – delivering 446 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 303 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Convertible is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 5.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Convertible delivers considerably more torque with 540 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 335 Nm more.

Mustang Convertible

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Renault Arkana offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is clearly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,876 kg. The difference is around 366 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries markedly more – 451 kg compared to 324 kg. That’s a difference of about 127 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Arkana is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,500
Arkana

Renault Arkana

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.7 L/100km
Ford Mustang Convertible
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Convertible

The Ford Mustang Convertible makes every drive feel like a small celebration, its exhaust note and open-air drama turning mundane routes into showstoppers. It’s a car that doubles as a weekend mood lifter and a credible everyday companion, blending swagger with surprising practicality.

details

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
Ford Mustang Convertible
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption

Price
56,900 - 59,900 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
12.3 - 12.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
280 - 282 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
61 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Convertible
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
2
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,876 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
310 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,810 mm
Length
-
Width
1,916 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
1,403 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
319 - 324 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
446 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 5.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
250 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
540 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
8
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
328 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
5,038 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.