VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mazda MX-30 comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Mazda MX-30?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mazda MX-30: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda MX-30 is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,580 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is only slightly more efficient: consuming 17.7 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Mazda MX-30. That’s a difference of about 0.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 515 km more than the Mazda MX-30.

MX-30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 317 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 5.3 s quicker.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda MX-30 is a bit lighter – 1,849 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 312 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers noticeably more boot space – 519 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 169 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries slightly more – 450 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 48 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mazda MX-30

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mazda MX-30

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
85 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
22 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Length
-
Length
4,395 mm
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Height
-
Height
1,555 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
402 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
140 km/h
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
125 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
830 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.