Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes C-Class EQ comparison
Compare performance (487 HP vs 489 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 58,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or Mercedes C-Class EQ?
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes C-Class EQ: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Mustang Mach-E
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Mustang Mach-E is moderately cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Mercedes C-Class EQ costs 58,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,610 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes C-Class EQ is markedly more efficient: consuming 14.3 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 3.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes C-Class EQ offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 753 km, about 153 km more than the Ford Mustang Mach-E.
C-Class EQ
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes C-Class EQ offers barely more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 487 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mercedes C-Class EQ takes 4 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers somewhat more torque with 950 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
Mustang Mach-E
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Mustang Mach-E is moderately lighter – 2,161 kg compared to 2,460 kg. The difference is around 299 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers only slightly more boot space – 519 L compared to 470 L. That’s a difference of about 49 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes C-Class EQ carries slightly more – 505 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes C-Class EQ
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.
details
Mercedes C-Class EQ
The Mercedes C‑Class EQ blends the familiar poise and luxury of the C‑Class with Mercedes' EQ electric ethos, delivering a quietly refined and modern driving experience. Inside, it pairs upscale materials and tech-forward touches with a composed ride that suits both city commuting and longer journeys.
details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Mercedes C-Class EQ
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
|
Price
58,000 - 67,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.3 - 15.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
|
Electric Range
706 - 753 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
|
Curb weight
2,460 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,881 mm
|
Width
1,892 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 450 kg
|
Payload
505 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
|
Power HP
489 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
|
Power kW
360 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.