VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs smart #3 comparison

Compare performance (487 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Mustang Mach-E or smart #3?

Ford Mustang Mach-E vs smart #3: Key differences

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • visibly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

smart #3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • moderately lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

smart #3 is moderately cheaper – starting at 42,000 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,437 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the smart #3 is very slightly more efficient: consuming 16.3 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 1.4 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers visibly more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 145 km more than the smart #3.

#3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers considerably more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 215 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the smart #3 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers substantially more torque with 950 Nm compared to 384 Nm. That’s about 566 Nm more.

Mustang Mach-E

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, smart #3 is moderately lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 351 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers markedly more boot space – 519 L compared to 370 L. That’s a difference of about 149 L.

Maximum payload is identical – both can carry up to 450 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 600 km
Ford Mustang Mach-E
smart #3

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details

smart #3

The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.

details
Ford Mustang Mach-E
smart #3

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Price
42,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Electric Range
455 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Curb weight
1,810 kg
Trunk capacity
519 L
Trunk capacity
370 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,881 mm
Width
1,844 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 450 kg
Payload
450 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Power HP
272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Torque
384 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Power kW
200 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
smart
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.