Compare performance (168 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 20,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Citroen C4?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Citroen C4 is moderately cheaper – starting at 20,600 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,352 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C4 uses 4.7 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is somewhat more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.5 kWh/100km for the Citroen C4. That’s a difference of about 1.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Citroen C4 offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 427 km, about 10 km more than the Ford Puma.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers barely more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Citroen C4 takes 8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers only slightly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is barely lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,403 kg. The difference is around 87 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries a bit more – 469 kg compared to 406 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.
The Ford Puma holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
detailsCitroën C4 wears its French eccentricity with confidence, pairing bold, sculpted styling with a supremely comfortable ride that turns mundane commutes into a gentler affair. If you value relaxed comfort, clever practicality and a car with personality rather than pretence, the C4 is a charming, sensible choice — and it won't make you miss the usual hot‑hatch theatrics.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
20,600 - 32,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 4.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 15.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
354 - 427 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
46 - 51 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 108 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,403 - 1,659 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
380 - 510 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,350 - 4,580 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,800 - 1,834 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,520 - 1,525 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,250 - 1,360 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
379 - 406 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
150 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Citroen
|