Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Honda HR-V - Differences and prices compared
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Honda HR-V costs 29700 £. That’s a price difference of around 4971 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: manages with and is therefore more efficient than the with . The difference is about per 100 km.
HR-V
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a noticeable edge – offering 168 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Honda HR-V takes 10.60 s. That’s about 3.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Honda HR-V tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls to a small extent stronger with 290 Nm compared to 253 Nm. That’s about 37 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .
In curb weight, Ford Puma is somewhat lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1452 kg. The difference is around 136 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 319 L. That’s a difference of about 204 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Honda HR-V performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1289 L, which is about 6 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma somewhat takes the win – 469 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Ford Puma shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £24,800
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Honda HR-V
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Honda HR-V
5 (2 Reviews)
The Honda HR-V is the sensible compact crossover that blends roomy practicality with a composed, friendly drive, making it an easy pick for buyers who want everyday usability without fuss. It won’t thrill hardcore enthusiasts, but its clever packaging, comfortable cabin and low-key styling make life simpler — and that’s exactly the point.
details
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Ford Puma
Honda HR-V
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
29700 - 35400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.40 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
122 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1452 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
319 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4355 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
-
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1582 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1289 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
418 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
131 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
253 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Honda
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.