VS

Ford Ranger vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 404 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 62,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Land Rover Range Rover Velar?

Ford Ranger vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • visibly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
details

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

  • markedly more power
  • markedly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Ranger is visibly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 62,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,532 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers markedly more range – reaching up to 58 km, about 16 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Range Rover Velar

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers markedly more power – delivering 404 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 123 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers barely more torque with 697 Nm compared to 650 Nm. That’s about 47 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Velar is noticeably lighter – 2,003 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 402 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries clearly more – 989 kg compared to 587 kg. That’s a difference of about 402 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover Velar sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £62,000
Range Rover Velar

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 404 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 10 L/100km
  • Electric Range 58 km
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Range Rover Velar

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.

details
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Range Rover Velar

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
62,000 - 87,400 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 10 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
58 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
103 - 228 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
2,003 - 2,280 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,933 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
460 - 587 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 - 2,997 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C, F
Brand
Ford
Brand
Land Rover
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.