Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Mazda CX-60 comparison
Compare performance (281 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Mazda CX-60?
Ford Ranger vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Ranger
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda CX-60 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,768 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Mazda CX-60 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 63 km, about 21 km more than the Ford Ranger.
CX-60
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers a bit more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers visibly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 147 Nm more.
Ranger
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is clearly lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 515 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries visibly more – 989 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 377 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-60 holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,700
Mazda CX-60
Ford Ranger
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Ford Ranger
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.