VS

Ford Ranger vs Mazda CX-60 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (292 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (37500 £ vs 43700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Mazda CX-60?

Ford Ranger

Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Ranger has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 37500 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6146 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Ranger manages with 3.10 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.80 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-60 performs noticeable better – achieving up to 63 km, about 21 km more than the Ford Ranger.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a a bit edge – offering 327 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 7.90 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Ranger pulls noticeable stronger with 697 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 147 Nm difference.

Ad · Affiliate
Car accessories
Car accessories
Popular best-sellers for everyday use & care
View on Amazon →
Boot organiser
Boot organiser
Storage boxes, nets & anti-slip solutions
Open best-sellers →
Car dash cams
Car dash cams
Safety, parking mode & 4K recording
See top models →
Car phone holders
Car phone holders
MagSafe, vent mounts & dashboard mounts
Browse popular mounts →
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is slightly lighter – 1890 kg compared to 2082 kg. The difference is around 192 kg.

When it comes to payload, Ford Ranger clearly takes the win – 1108 kg compared to 612 kg. That’s a difference of about 496 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Ford Ranger
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £37,500
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 - 292 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.1 - 13.8 L
  • Electric Range : 42 km
details

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Ford Ranger

Reviews Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
Mazda CX-60
Toyota RAV4
VS
In the burgeoning compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Toyota RAV4 stand out with their distinct blends of style and utility. While the CX-60 offers a more upscale interior and sporty driving dynamics, the RAV4 excels in practicality and fuel efficiency, making it a top choice for families. …
Ford Ranger
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
Price
37500 - 71900 £
Price
43700 - 57900 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
11.80 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 315 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
2 - 4
Doors
-
Curb weight
2082 - 2511 kg
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
5370 - 5420 mm
Length
-
Width
1918 - 1968 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1868 - 1922 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
676 - 1108 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 - 292 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 12.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
405 - 697 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
125 - 215 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1996 - 2993 cm3
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General
Model Year
2022 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging …
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda CX-60
VS
When comparing the CUPRA Terramar and the Mazda CX-60, enthusiasts will find a compelling battle between sporty performance and refined practicality. The Terramar stands out with its aggressive design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who crave adrenaline on the road. In contrast, …
Ford Ranger
Toyota Land Cruiser
VS
The Ford Ranger and Toyota Land Cruiser compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the bustling mid-size SUV market, the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 compete fiercely with their distinctive attributes. The CX-60 boasts a more compact, urban-friendly design, making it ideal for city drivers, while the larger CX-80 offers expansive interior space and additional seating, targeting …
Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC60
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. The CX-60 impresses with its dynamic handling and engaging driving experience, while the XC60 shines in terms of luxury and advanced safety …
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-60
VS
The Lexus NX and Mazda CX-60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drive types are available for the Ford Ranger?

The Ford Ranger is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.