VS

Ford Ranger vs Mercedes EQA comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 228 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 45,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Mercedes EQA?

Ford Ranger vs Mercedes EQA: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • moderately more power
details

Mercedes EQA

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mercedes EQA is marginally cheaper – starting at 45,900 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,565 £.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQA offers significantly more range – reaching up to 476 km, about 434 km more than the Ford Ranger.

EQA

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers moderately more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 228 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQA is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 7.7 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers significantly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 390 Nm. That’s about 307 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQA is slightly lighter – 2,115 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 290 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries clearly more – 989 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 564 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQA is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,900
EQA

Mercedes EQA

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 228 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 476 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes EQA
Mercedes GLA
VS
In the battle of compact luxury, the Mercedes EQA and GLA offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. While the EQA stands out with its electric powertrain and eco-friendly appeal, the GLA retains the versatility and familiar dynamics of a traditional combustion engine. …
Mercedes EQA
Mercedes GLC
VS
Mercedes EQA and Mercedes GLC go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mercedes EQA or the …
Ford Ranger
Mercedes EQA

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details
20C0579_017
20C0579_042
20C0579_040
20C0579_060

Reviews Mercedes EQA

4.7 (2 Reviews)
rate
Nöthi
27 Jul 2026, 18:41:16

Fantastic build quality and genuine premium-class feel with lots of features like distance sensors or the speed-limit sign reader — things Mercedes still brags about in the GLC even five years later...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes EQA
VW ID.5
VS
In the growing segment of electric SUVs, the Mercedes EQA stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology, appealing to drivers who prioritize comfort and prestige. Meanwhile, the VW ID.5 offers a more sporty design and more spacious cargo capacity, appealing to those seeking …
Mercedes EQA
VW ID.4
VS
The Mercedes EQA feels like a compact EV dressed for the boardroom — polished interior, serene ride and undeniable badge prestige, but you trade off some cabin space and a modest range for the name. The VW ID.4 is the sensible opposite: roomy, practical and better value with more usable range, …
Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …
Ford Ranger
VW Amarok
VS
In the competitive realm of midsize pickups, the Ford Ranger and VW Amarok showcase distinctive strengths that cater to varied preferences. The Ford Ranger is celebrated for its robust towing capacity and advanced tech features, making it a favorite for both rugged adventures and urban commuting. …
Ford Ranger
Maxus T90 EV
VS
Ford Ranger and Maxus T90 EV go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or the Maxus …
Mercedes EQA
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the latest showdown between the Mercedes EQA and Skoda Enyaq, luxury meets practicality in an electrifying competition. The EQA impresses with its premium materials and advanced technology, catering to those who crave a refined driving experience, while the Enyaq stands out for its spacious …
Ford Ranger
Isuzu D-Max
VS
In the competitive midsize pickup segment, the Ford Ranger and Isuzu D-Max offer robust performance and versatility for both work and recreation. The Ranger impresses with its powerful engine options and advanced technology features, while the D-Max is renowned for its durability and off-road …
BMW iX1
Mercedes EQA
VS
The BMW iX1 is the feisty compact EV that still drives like a BMW, with sharper handling and a practical cabin, while the Mercedes EQA prefers to charm you with a softer ride and a more polished, luxe interior. Choose the iX1 for driver engagement and better value, or the EQA if you want plush …
Ford Ranger
Mercedes EQA

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
476 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
2,115 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
340 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,834 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
228 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
390 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
168 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.