VS

Ford Ranger vs MG HS comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or MG HS?

Ford Ranger vs MG HS: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • very slightly more power
details

MG HS

4.8 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG HS is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,448 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG HS uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Ranger with 3.1 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.

As for electric range, the MG HS offers significantly more range – reaching up to 100 km, about 58 km more than the Ford Ranger.

HS

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers very slightly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 9 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG HS is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers considerably more torque with 697 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 347 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG HS is noticeably lighter – 1,735 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 670 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries clearly more – 989 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 589 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG HS is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
HS

MG HS

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 224 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range 100 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
MG HS
VS
Put the Hyundai Tucson up against the MG HS and its plug‑in EHS sibling and you get a tasty choice: Korean refinement and all‑round polish versus MG's bargain-packed, tech-forward alternatives. We'll sort practicality, driving feel, equipment and running costs so you can pick the SUV that actually …
BYD Seal U
MG HS
VS
Comparing the BYD Seal and the MG HS puts a modern electric fastback (the BYD Seal) up against a traditional compact SUV (the MG HS) that prioritizes practicality and interior space. This quick guide focuses on real-world driving feel, running costs, tech and ownership considerations so you can …
Ford Ranger
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

MG HS

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details
Left-Front-45
Front-Side
Right-Back-45
Side-large-interior-1

Reviews MG HS

4.8 (10 Reviews)
rate
Ste
5 Jun 2026, 12:05:05

Hg: clearly the price, the equipment, the power, and of course the 7-year warranty, not just 3.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jose
3 Jun 2026, 15:41:56

Very competitive price
Very good and adequate finishes
Premium features
Extremely quiet

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Frequently compared as well

MG HS
MG MGS9
VS
Choosing between the MG HS and the MG MGS9 comes down to whether you value compact practicality and efficiency or a larger, more upmarket presence and space. This quick comparison will focus on driving feel, interior room, technology and running costs to help you pick the best fit.
Dacia Bigster
MG HS
VS
This comparison pits the Dacia Bigster against the MG HS to help real buyers choose between a rugged, value-focused family SUV and a more polished, feature-rich rival. The Bigster prioritises low running costs, robustness and space, while the MG HS offers greater refinement, kit and driving comfort …
BYD Atto 2
MG HS
VS
The BYD Atto 2 and MG HS both aim at buyers wanting a compact SUV, but they take very different approaches — the Atto 2 is an electric, tech-forward crossover, while the MG HS is a conventional petrol-powered family SUV focused on space and value. This comparison will help you weigh EV range, …
Ford Kuga
MG HS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG HS are popular compact SUVs that appeal to buyers after roomy cabins and practical everyday driving — the Kuga leans toward sharper handling and more refined powertrain options, while the MG HS focuses on strong value and generous standard kit. This comparison cuts through the …
Opel Grandland
MG HS
VS
The Vauxhall Grandland and the MG HS are both compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practicality and value, but they take different routes on ride refinement, interior quality and equipment. If you favour a more polished drive and a stronger dealer network, the Grandland is worth considering, …
MG HS
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Think of the MG HS (and its EHS plug‑in hybrid) as the sensible, budget‑friendly family SUV — roomy, comfortable and annoyingly practical — while the MG MGS5 EV flips the script with instant electric torque, sharper handling and far more tech for your money. Pick the HS/EHS if you want proven value …
Ford Ranger
Maxus T60 MAX
VS
If you're choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Maxus T60 MAX, you're weighing a proven, globally popular midsize pickup against a newer, value-focused contender. I’ll compare their practicality, performance, comfort and running costs so you can pick the one that best fits your workday and …
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the MG HS comes down to whether you want a compact crossover that prioritises bold styling and tech, or a more traditionally sized SUV that leans on space and refinement. Below is a clear, experience-based comparison to help match each model to your driving …
Ford Ranger
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
30,000 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
14 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,735 - 1,930 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
441 - 507 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
224 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
340 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
165 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
MG
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.