What drive types are available for the Ford Ranger?

The Ford Ranger is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Ford Ranger?

Up to 292 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Ford Ranger according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 3.10 L.

What is the battery capacity of the Ford Ranger?

The battery capacity is 11.80 kWh.

What is the top speed of the Ford Ranger?

The Ford Ranger reaches up to 190 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the Ford Ranger?

Length 5370 mm, width 1918 mm, height 1884 mm – those are the dimensions of the Ford Ranger.

What drivetrain options does the MG MG3 have?

The MG MG3 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the MG MG3?

Depending on the version, the MG MG3 delivers up to 194 HP.

How much fuel does the MG MG3 use?

On average, the MG MG3 consumes 4.40 L.

What maximum speed does the MG MG3 reach?

The MG MG3 reaches up to 185 km/h.

How big is the MG MG3 overall?

Length 4113 mm, width 1797 mm, height 1502 mm – those are the dimensions of the MG MG3.

Ford Ranger vs MG MG3 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG MG3 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15400 £, while the Ford Ranger costs 37500 £. That’s a price difference of around 22105 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Ranger manages with 3.10 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the MG MG3 with 4.40 L. The difference is about 1.30 L per 100 km.

MG3

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger has a noticeable edge – offering 292 HP compared to 194 HP. That’s roughly 98 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.90 s, while the MG MG3 takes 8 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Ranger performs slight better – reaching 190 km/h, while the MG MG3 tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Ranger pulls clearly stronger with 697 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 549 Nm difference.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, MG MG3 is decisively lighter – 1237 kg compared to 2082 kg. The difference is around 845 kg.

When it comes to payload, Ford Ranger decisively takes the win – 1108 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 660 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Ford Ranger proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Ranger is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Ford Ranger

Reviews MG MG3

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

MG MG3

MG MG4

VS

In the competitive hatchback segment, the MG MG3 stands out with its practicality and affordability, appealing to budget-conscious drivers seeking reliable performance. Meanwhile, the MG MG4 impresses with its advanced technology and electric powertrain, catering to environmentally-minded consumers …

MG MG3

MG ZS

VS

In the automotive showdown between the MG MG3 and MG ZS, drivers are treated to a compelling choice between practicality and versatility. The MG3 distinguishes itself with its nimble handling and budget-friendly pricing, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the MG ZS …

Costs and Consumption
Price 37500 - 71900 £	Price 15400 - 21400 £
Consumption L/100km 3.1 - 13.8 L	Consumption L/100km 4.4 - 6.1 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 42 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 11.80 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 70 - 315 g/km	co2 100 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 80 L	Fuel tank capacity 36 - 45 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Pickup	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 2 - 5	Seats 5
Doors 2 - 4	Doors 5
Curb weight 2082 - 2511 kg	Curb weight 1237 - 1285 kg
Trunk capacity -	Trunk capacity 293 L
Length 5370 - 5420 mm	Length 4113 mm
Width 1918 - 1968 mm	Width 1797 mm
Height 1868 - 1922 mm	Height 1502 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 983 L
Payload 676 - 1108 kg	Payload 373 - 448 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid	Engine Type Full Hybrid, Petrol
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 170 - 292 HP	Power HP 116 - 194 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.9 - 12.1 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8 - 10.8 s
Max Speed 180 - 190 km/h	Max Speed 170 - 185 km/h
Torque 405 - 697 Nm	Torque 148 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 125 - 215 kW	Power kW 85 - 143 kW
Engine capacity 1996 - 2993 cm3	Engine capacity 1490 - 1495 cm3