VS

Ford Ranger vs MINI Countryman comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 313 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 30,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or MINI Countryman?

Ford Ranger vs MINI Countryman: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • significantly more efficient
details

MINI Countryman

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MINI Countryman is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,100 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,354 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the MINI Countryman with 5.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the MINI Countryman offers substantially more range – reaching up to 497 km, about 455 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Countryman

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Countryman offers a bit more power – delivering 313 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 32 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Countryman is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.6 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers noticeably more torque with 697 Nm compared to 494 Nm. That’s about 203 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MINI Countryman is considerably lighter – 1,570 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 835 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries clearly more – 989 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 489 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Countryman holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,100
Countryman

MINI Countryman

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 122 - 313 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.9 - 6.5 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 463 - 497 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
MINI Countryman
VS
Kia's fresh EV3 goes head-to-head with the MINI Countryman in a fight that contrasts pragmatic electric range and modern tech with charismatic style and all‑round versatility. We compare space, equipment, driving feel and ownership costs to find which one earns its place in your garage.
MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
Comparing the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman helps you decide between a compact, city-focused crossover and a roomier, more practical small SUV. The Aceman prioritises agile handling, crisp urban packaging and striking style, while the Countryman brings more interior space, versatile cargo …
Ford Ranger
MINI Countryman

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

MINI Countryman

The MINI Countryman turns the cheeky charm of a classic MINI into a proper all-rounder, blending playful styling with surprisingly usable space for everyday life. It still grins at city lights but will happily tackle muddy lanes, perfect for buyers who want character without sacrificing practicality.

details
P90484775_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90484787_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90484779_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90454013_highRes_mini-cooper-s-countr

Reviews MINI Countryman

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Urszula
13 Apr 2026, 06:42:12

Beautiful design, carefully finished inside, large display, very comfortable ride with the automatic gearbox, a bit cramped in the back, fairly spacious boot.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

BMW iX1
MINI Countryman
VS
Deciding between the BMW iX1 and the MINI Countryman? This comparison cuts through the marketing to focus on what matters—interior space, driving dynamics, efficiency and running costs—so you can choose whether the iX1’s electric sophistication or the Countryman’s flexible character fits your life …
Ford Ranger
Maxus T60 MAX
VS
If you're choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Maxus T60 MAX, you're weighing a proven, globally popular midsize pickup against a newer, value-focused contender. I’ll compare their practicality, performance, comfort and running costs so you can pick the one that best fits your workday and …
Audi Q3
MINI Countryman
VS
Audi Q3 and MINI Countryman go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
MINI Countryman
VW ID.3
VS
In the battle between the MINI Countryman and the VW ID.3, drivers can expect a clash of style and innovation. The Countryman offers a distinctive blend of retro charm and practicality, making it a favorite for those who appreciate iconic design. Meanwhile, the ID.3 stands out with its fully …
Ford Puma
MINI Countryman
VS
In the spirited competition of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and MINI Countryman stand out as impressive contenders, each offering unique advantages. The Ford Puma shines with its sporty design and agile performance, making it an excellent choice for those who prioritize nimbleness and fuel …
MINI Countryman
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the MINI Countryman and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value the Countryman's premium, sporty feel or the Elroq's roomy practicality and value. This comparison highlights the real-world differences in driving character, interior space, equipment and running costs to help …
MINI Countryman
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Unsure whether the MINI Countryman or the Suzuki Vitara is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Ranger
Maxus T90 EV
VS
Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or the Maxus T90 EV is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Ranger
MINI Countryman

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
30,100 - 39,900 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.9 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
463 - 497 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
0 - 149 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,570 - 2,075 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
450 - 460 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,843 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
475 - 500 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
122 - 313 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 10.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
230 - 494 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
90 - 230 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
MINI
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.