VS

MINI Countryman vs VW T-Roc comparison

Compare performance (313 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (30,100 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Countryman or VW T-Roc?

MINI Countryman vs VW T-Roc: Key differences

MINI Countryman

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • barely lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Countryman

A Spirited Showdown: MINI Countryman vs. VW T-Roc

In the contemporary compact SUV arena, two nameplates rise to prominence: the MINI Countryman and the VW T-Roc. Both vehicles exude charm, but when it comes to engineering, performance, and innovation, how do they really stack up against each other? Here we delve into an incisive comparison of these dynamic models, both tailored for the 2024 model year.

T-Roc

Under the Hood: Performance and Power

The MINI Countryman leaps forward with a variety of engine choices, ranging from petrol mild-hybrid (MHEV), diesel MHEV, to a pure electric drive. The standout is the 313 HP electric variant, which offers brisk acceleration from 0-100 km/h in just 5.4 seconds, ensuring a thrilling drive. It also impresses with an electric range of up to 462 kilometers. For traditionalists, the petrol and diesel engines range up to 170 and 163 HP respectively, each with a dual-clutch automatic transmission for seamless shifts.

On the flip side, the VW T-Roc presents a mix of petrol and diesel engines, boasting power outputs from a modest 115 HP up to a sprightly 300 HP. The T-Roc's 300 HP variant accelerates from 0-100 km/h in a swift 4.9 seconds, courtesy of its all-wheel-drive system and dual-clutch automatic transmission.

Countryman

Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency is paramount in modern vehicles, and here both models exhibit innovation. The MINI Countryman's electric variant shows a remarkable efficiency of 15.7 kWh/100 km. Its petrol engines also deliver competitive fuel consumption figures, with as low as 4.6 L/100 km and CO2 emissions starting at 120 g/km, making it a clean choice.

Conversely, the T-Roc delivers fuel economy figures from 4.7 to 6.3 L/100 km, depending on the engine, with CO2 emissions landing between 125 and 194 g/km. Though not as low as the Countryman's, it's efficient enough for those prioritizing petrol power.

T-Roc

Interior Space and Practicality

For those requiring practicality, both SUVs cater admirably. The MINI Countryman offers a decent trunk capacity of up to 505 liters, slightly exceeding that of the T-Roc's maximum of 445 liters. Both models comfortably seat five passengers, though the Countryman's slightly larger dimensions give it an edge in interior spaciousness.

Countryman

Advanced Features and Innovation

In terms of technology, the Countryman and T-Roc offer differing attractions. The Countryman's cutting-edge infotainment system with an intuitive interface pairs seamlessly with its eco-friendly powertrains, highlighting MINI's commitment to sustainable innovation.

The T-Roc, however, packs a punch with its array of driver-assistance systems such as adaptive cruise control and park assist, enhancing safety and ease of use. VW’s latest connectivity offerings ensure drivers remain in touch with the digital world.

T-Roc

The Verdict: Tailored Experience for Different Tastes

Ultimately, choosing between the MINI Countryman and the VW T-Roc comes down to individual preference. The Countryman caters to the eco-conscious with its electric variant and lower emissions, along with a stylish and spacious build. Meanwhile, the T-Roc beckons those seeking robust traditional performance and a suite of advanced technology to make driving both fun and safe.

Both models represent the pinnacle of their marque's engineering innovation and display the modern compact SUV's ability to offer versatile and engaging driving experiences. The decision lies in aligning their unique attributes with your driving desires.

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Countryman

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

VW T-Roc is somewhat cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the MINI Countryman costs 30,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,647 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MINI Countryman uses 4.6 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Countryman offers clearly more power – delivering 313 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Countryman is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Countryman delivers considerably more torque with 494 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 244 Nm more.

Countryman

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is barely lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 1,570 kg. The difference is around 105 kg.

Looking at boot space, the MINI Countryman offers substantially more boot space – 505 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 221 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries barely more – 515 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Countryman is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,100
Countryman

MINI Countryman

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 122 - 313 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 463 - 497 km
details
MINI Countryman
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MINI Countryman

The MINI Countryman turns the cheeky charm of a classic MINI into a proper all-rounder, blending playful styling with surprisingly usable space for everyday life. It still grins at city lights but will happily tackle muddy lanes, perfect for buyers who want character without sacrificing practicality.

details
P90484775_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90484787_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90484779_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count
P90454013_highRes_mini-cooper-s-countr

Reviews MINI Countryman

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Urszula
13 Apr 2026, 06:42:12

Beautiful design, carefully finished inside, large display, very comfortable ride with the automatic gearbox, a bit cramped in the back, fairly spacious boot.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW T-Roc

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
Kia EV3
MINI Countryman
VS
Kia's fresh EV3 goes head-to-head with the MINI Countryman in a fight that contrasts pragmatic electric range and modern tech with charismatic style and all‑round versatility. We compare space, equipment, driving feel and ownership costs to find which one earns its place in your garage.
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca is the sensible, roomy sibling that prioritises practicality and comfort, while the VW T‑Roc plays the cooler, more characterful role with sharper styling and a slightly cheekier drive — both share the VW Group's solid underpinnings and similar engines. Choose the Ateca if you need …
Toyota C-HR
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Toyota C-HR stands out with its striking design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW T-Roc offers a more traditional, yet stylish approach with a focus on practicality and customizable features, catering to …
Renault Captur
VW T-Roc
VS
The Renault Captur and VW T-Roc both stand out in the compact SUV segment, each offering unique strengths to cater to different audiences. The Captur boasts a stylish, urban design with customizable options and a focus on fuel efficiency, making it perfect for city dwellers. In contrast, the T-Roc …
MINI Countryman
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,100 - 45,300 £
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
463 - 497 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 177 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 54 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,570 - 2,075 kg
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Trunk capacity
450 - 505 L
Trunk capacity
284 L
Length
4,444 - 4,447 mm
Length
-
Width
1,843 mm
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Height
1,645 - 1,661 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,450 - 1,530 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
460 - 500 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Petrol, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 - 313 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 10.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
208 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 494 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
90 - 230 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
MINI
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the MINI Countryman?

The MINI Countryman is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.