VS

Ford Ranger vs Vauxhall Mokka comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 23,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Vauxhall Mokka?

Ford Ranger vs Vauxhall Mokka: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • substantially more efficient
details

Vauxhall Mokka

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Vauxhall Mokka is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,000 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25,391 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Vauxhall Mokka with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Vauxhall Mokka offers considerably more range – reaching up to 403 km, about 361 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Mokka

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

Both models deliver identical power – 281 HP each.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Vauxhall Mokka is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers substantially more torque with 697 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 352 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Mokka is considerably lighter – 1,294 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 1,111 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries considerably more – 989 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 589 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Vauxhall Mokka is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,000
Mokka

Vauxhall Mokka

  • Engine Type Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic, Manual
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 136 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 336 - 403 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Opel Frontera
Opel Mokka
VS
Comparing the Opel Frontera and the Opel Mokka highlights two very different takes on the SUV idea: the Frontera is a rugged, older off‑road capable SUV, while the Mokka is a modern compact crossover built for city life and efficiency. This short guide will walk through their real‑world strengths …
Opel Mokka
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Vauxhall Mokka and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise urban agility and distinctive style or a more refined, spacious and versatile compact SUV. The Mokka stands out for bold design and nippy city manners, while the VW T‑Roc offers sharper handling, more interior …
Ford Ranger
Vauxhall Mokka

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Vauxhall Mokka

The Opel Mokka is a compact crossover that blends bold, modern styling with a practical, city-friendly footprint. It delivers a comfortable ride and a well-appointed interior with straightforward tech, making it a smart choice for urban drivers who want a stylish yet sensible small SUV.

details
001_Opel-Mokka-512749
006_Opel-Mokka-512753
005_Opel-Mokka-512752
015_Opel-Mokka-512759
011_Opel-Mokka-513096

Reviews Vauxhall Mokka

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
yannick
18 Apr 2026, 11:17:27

I've been an Opel owner for 34 years and am very satisfied with the brand — my choice will be an easy one.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Opel Corsa
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Corsa is the cheeky city hatch that zips into parking spaces and pockets with equal ease, while the Opel Mokka trades that nimble charm for SUV attitude, a higher driving position and a few extra inches of boot space. If you want affordable fun and frugal running costs, pick the Corsa; if …
Opel Astra
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Astra is the grown-up compact — practical, composed and roomy enough for weekend gear, while the Opel Mokka trades boot space for a higher driving position, sharper looks and crossover sass. Pick the Astra for better value, comfort and lower running costs; choose the Mokka if you crave …
Opel Mokka
Peugeot 2008
VS
Opel Mokka brings punchy engines, chunky SUV looks and a practical, straightforward cabin that’s easy to live with — ideal if you want fuss-free value and a touch of rugged charm. The Peugeot 2008 bets on style and tech, with a striking interior, nimble handling and the addictive i‑Cockpit layout, …
Opel Grandland
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Grandland feels like the sensible grown-up in the family — roomy, softly suspended and better suited to long journeys or a big grocery run, while the Opel Mokka is the cheeky urbanite: compact, bold-looking and blissfully easy to park. Pick the Grandland for space and comfort, the Mokka if …
Opel Mokka
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Opel Mokka brings flamboyant styling and a punchy road presence that feels more SUV than small crossover, with sharper handling and a roomier cabin than you might expect. The Toyota Yaris Cross trades flash for clever practicality and hybrid frugality — pick the Mokka for personality and pace, …
MG ZS
Opel Mokka
VS
Choosing between the MG ZS and the Opel Mokka comes down to whether you prioritize straightforward value and practicality or sharper styling and a more refined driving feel. Below I’ll compare their space, equipment, running costs and driving dynamics so you can pick the compact SUV that best …
Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Kia Stonic
Opel Mokka
VS
Comparing the Kia Stonic and the Opel Mokka helps buyers choose between two compact crossovers that prioritize city-friendly dimensions, practicality and efficient running costs. The Stonic focuses on affordability and straightforward value, while the Mokka brings sharper styling, a more …
Ford Ranger
Vauxhall Mokka

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
23,000 - 40,500 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
336 - 403 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,294 - 1,672 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
310 - 350 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,787 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
388 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
136 - 281 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Vauxhall
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.