Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Skoda Octavia Combi comparison
Compare performance (281 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 25,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Skoda Octavia Combi?
Ford Ranger vs Skoda Octavia Combi: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Ranger
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Octavia Combi is significantly cheaper – starting at 25,600 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,862 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Skoda Octavia Combi with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.
Octavia Combi
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers noticeably more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 77 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Combi is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.7 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers substantially more torque with 697 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 337 Nm more.
Ranger
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is significantly lighter – 1,366 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 1,039 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries considerably more – 989 kg compared to 534 kg. That’s a difference of about 455 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Ranger is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £48,400
Ford Ranger
Ford Ranger
Skoda Octavia Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
Skoda Octavia Combi
The Skoda Octavia Combi is a practical, well‑packaged estate that delivers generous and flexible interior space ideal for families or active owners. Its sensible cabin layout, comfortable ride and solid reputation for reliability make it a pragmatic choice for buyers who value utility over flash.
details
Ford Ranger
Skoda Octavia Combi
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
Price
25,600 - 39,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
co2
113 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
1,366 - 1,553 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
Width
1,829 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Payload
502 - 534 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.