Compare performance (281 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 28,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or SsangYong Musso?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
SsangYong Musso is considerably cheaper – starting at 28,700 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,734 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the SsangYong Musso with 8.4 L/100km. The difference is about 5.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers clearly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 79 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers significantly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 297 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, SsangYong Musso is slightly lighter – 2,045 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 360 kg.
When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Musso carries only slightly more – 1,010 kg compared to 989 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.
The Ford Ranger is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
detailsThe Musso is a no-nonsense pickup that blends rugged capability with surprisingly comfy cabin manners, perfect for buyers who want practicality over prestige. It may not turn heads at the coffee stop, but its sensible layout, useful load space and low running costs make it a very pragmatic choice for workdays and weekends.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
Price
28,700 - 42,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
8.4 - 9.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
co2
221 - 245 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
75 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
2,045 - 2,260 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,095 - 5,405 mm
|
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
Width
1,950 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,840 - 1,855 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Payload
785 - 1,010 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
183 - 187 km/h
|
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
149 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
SsangYong
|