VS

Ford Ranger vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (292 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (45,600 £ vs 49,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Volvo XC60?

Ford Ranger vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • very slightly cheaper
details

Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Ranger is very slightly cheaper – starting at 45,600 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,608 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 2.8 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Ford Ranger with 3.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 82 km, about 40 km more than the Ford Ranger.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers clearly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Ford Ranger is only slightly faster – reaching 190 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers marginally more torque with 709 Nm compared to 697 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC60 is visibly lighter – 1,900 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 505 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries significantly more – 989 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 439 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Meet the Volvo XC60 and the new Volvo EX60 — two mid‑size premium SUVs that look like cousins but drive like rivals, one rooted in combustion tradition and the other staking Volvo’s claim in the electric future. Which should you buy: the familiar, comfort-first XC60 that does everything reliably …
Ford Ranger
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Volvo XC60 stands out with its elegant Scandinavian design and a strong emphasis on safety features, making it a top choice for families and safety-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the VW Tayron impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, appealing …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
In the highly competitive midsize SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinctive approaches to style and performance. While the Kuga excels with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the XC60 offers a luxurious cabin and a refined driving experience. …
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
When it comes to luxury compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 both offer a blend of performance, style, and cutting-edge technology. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its elegant interior and advanced infotainment system, perfect for those who value luxury and connectivity. Alternatively, …
Volvo XC60
Dacia Bigster
VS
In a comparison between the Volvo XC60 and the Dacia Bigster, each SUV brings distinct offerings to the table. The Volvo XC60 impresses with its Scandinavian design, premium materials, and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for those who prioritize luxury and technology. Meanwhile, …
Ford Ranger
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
45,600 - 71,900 £
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
11.8 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 315 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
5,370 - 5,381 mm
Length
4,708 mm
Width
1,918 - 1,968 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
1,884 - 1,922 mm
Height
1,655 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
Payload
676 - 989 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
210 - 292 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
491 - 697 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
154 - 215 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.