Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Volvo XC90 comparison
Compare performance (150 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (27,300 £ vs 74,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Connect or Volvo XC90?
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Volvo XC90: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Tourneo Connect
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Tourneo Connect is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 74,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 46,963 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Volvo XC90 with 3.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers significantly more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 50 km more than the Volvo XC90.
XC90
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 offers significantly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 256 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.1 s. That’s about 4.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC90 delivers substantially more torque with 669 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 319 Nm more.
Tourneo Connect
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Connect is markedly lighter – 1,542 kg compared to 2,080 kg. The difference is around 538 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Connect carries somewhat more – 818 kg compared to 710 kg. That’s a difference of about 108 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Tourneo Connect is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,300
Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Tourneo Connect
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Tourneo Connect
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
Volvo XC90
The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.
details
Ford Tourneo Connect
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
Price
74,300 - 84,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
69 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
co2
71 - 188 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,350 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,923 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Payload
600 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 406 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 669 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 299 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.