Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Tourneo Courier vs Mazda CX-80 comparison
Compare performance (136 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Courier or Mazda CX-80?
Ford Tourneo Courier vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Tourneo Courier
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Tourneo Courier is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,514 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Tourneo Courier with 6.6 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Courier offers considerably more range – reaching up to 320 km, about 260 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
CX-80
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 191 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm more.
Tourneo Courier
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Courier is substantially lighter – 1,517 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 614 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Courier offers considerably more boot space – 570 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 312 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries clearly more – 650 kg compared to 483 kg. That’s a difference of about 167 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-80 is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,300
Mazda CX-80
Ford Tourneo Courier
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Tourneo Courier
The Ford Tourneo Courier is a cheeky, compact people carrier that turns urban errands into a pleasure, thanks to a spacious, cleverly packaged cabin and genuinely practical storage everywhere you look. It drives with reassuringly car-like manners, so the ride is comfy for school runs and shopping trips, and sensible touches like fold-flat seats, a high driving position and plentiful cubbies make it a smart, fuss-free choice for small families and weekend haulers.
details
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Ford Tourneo Courier
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,800 - 35,000 £
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.6 - 6.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
320 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,517 - 1,545 kg
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,800 - 1,813 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
480 - 483 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 136 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
92 - 100 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.