Compare performance (150 HP vs 442 HP), boot space and price (50,500 £ vs 46,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Bus or Volvo EC40?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Volvo EC40 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 46,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Bus costs 50,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,966 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EC40 offers clearly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 292 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EC40 delivers considerably more torque with 670 Nm compared to 390 Nm. That’s about 280 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo EC40 is slightly lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,338 kg. The difference is around 273 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Volvo EC40 offers significantly more boot space – 404 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 404 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Bus carries significantly more – 1,162 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 727 kg.
The Volvo EC40 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the reliable people-mover operators turn to when they need space, stamina and sensible running costs without fuss. It doesn't try to be glamorous, but its practical interior, flexible layouts and honest character make it a smart, stress-free choice for shuttle services and group transport.
detailsThe Volvo EC40 feels like a polished slice of Scandinavian calm on wheels, blending minimalist design with a cocoon-like interior that makes everyday driving surprisingly serene. It’s an electric compact that puts safety and comfort front and center, while still injecting enough personality and tech-savvy charm to keep city buyers smiling.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
50,500 - 52,900 £
|
Price
46,500 - 59,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
9.4 - 9.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
486 - 585 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
245 - 248 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,338 - 2,385 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,185 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
Trunk capacity
404 L
|
|
Length
5,531 - 5,981 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,873 mm
|
|
Height
2,530 - 2,533 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
1,115 - 1,162 kg
|
Payload
395 - 435 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
360 - 390 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
96 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|