In the highly competitive electric SUV market, the Volvo EC40 and Polestar 4 offer distinctive approaches to design and performance. The EC40 impresses with its practicality, spacious interior, and commitment to sustainability, making it a strong choice for environmentally-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Polestar 4 stands out with its sleek aesthetics and performance-driven electric powertrain, catering to those who prioritize style and dynamic driving experience.
The automotive landscape is rapidly evolving, especially with the rise of electric vehicles (EVs). Among the notable contenders in the SUV segment are the Volvo EC40 and the Polestar 4. Both vehicles boast impressive specifications and a commitment to sustainability, but they cater to slightly different segments of the market. This comparison will delve into the technical aspects, innovations, and overall driving experiences offered by these two electric SUVs.
The Volvo EC40 strikes a balance between power and efficiency, offering a rear-wheel drive layout powered by a 238 to 252 HP electric motor. It can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.3 seconds, making it a brisk performer for urban and suburban driving. With a torque output of 420 Nm, the EC40 ensures a smooth drive while maintaining energy efficiency, consuming about 16.2-16.7 kWh per 100 km depending on the variant.
On the flip side, the Polestar 4 offers a significantly more powerful driving experience with options of either rear-wheel or all-wheel drive. It packs an astonishing 272 HP or a monstrous 544 HP in its performance variant, allowing it to rocket from 0 to 100 km/h in just 3.8 seconds. Its torque ranges from 343 Nm in the base model to 686 Nm in the high-performance version, underscoring its sporty credentials. However, this power comes at a cost; the Polestar 4 consumes between 17.8-18.7 kWh for every 100 km traveled.
When it comes to range, the Volvo EC40 boasts an impressive electric range of 487 to 584 km, depending on the battery capacity chosen (67 kWh or 79 kWh). This makes it suitable for long-distance travel with adequate planning for charging stops.
Conversely, the Polestar 4 takes the lead in this category, with an electric range that varies from 590 to 620 km thanks to its larger 94 kWh battery. This extended range opens up possibilities for road trips and less frequent charging, making it a great option for those who prioritize long journeys.
In terms of size, the Volvo EC40 measures 4,440 mm in length, 1,873 mm in width, and 1,591 mm in height, providing ample interior space for five passengers and cargo. The trunk capacity is measured at 404 liters, allowing for practical storage options.
The Polestar 4 is notably larger, with measurements of 4,840 mm in length, 2,008 mm in width, and a height of 1,534 mm. This larger dimensions translate into a roomier cabin, accommodating the same number of passengers but with a more expansive trunk capacity of 526 liters. This can enhance the overall utility of the vehicle, especially for families or those requiring more cargo space.
Both models are loaded with cutting-edge technology and safety features. The Volvo EC40 maintains Volvo’s reputation for safety, with advanced driver-assistance systems that enhance driving security and autonomy. The infotainment system integrates seamlessly with popular apps and services, providing an intuitive user experience.
The Polestar 4, on the other hand, features a more performance-oriented interface, offering an array of driving modes that cater to the preferences of enthusiasts. Additionally, it provides state-of-the-art connectivity options, including smartphone integration and over-the-air updates for its software, ensuring that users can enjoy the latest features without visiting a dealership.
Choosing between the Volvo EC40 and the Polestar 4 ultimately comes down to individual preferences. The EC40 is an efficient and practical SUV that emphasizes safety and a sustainable driving experience. Meanwhile, the Polestar 4 stands out as a powerful and stylish option for performance enthusiasts looking for a sporty yet functional electric SUV. Both vehicles are commendable in their own rights, and potential buyers will find it hard to go wrong with either choice in the burgeoning electric SUV market.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 45200 - 58500
£
|
Price
about 53100 - 59900
£
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.2 - 17.3
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 18.7
kWh
|
Electric Range
487 - 584
km
|
Electric Range
590 - 620
km
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
94
kWh
|
co2
0
g/km
|
co2
0
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
2065 - 2185
kg
|
Curb weight
2230 - 2355
kg
|
Trunk capacity
404
L
|
Trunk capacity
526
L
|
Length
4440
mm
|
Length
4840
mm
|
Width
1873
mm
|
Width
2008
mm
|
Height
1591
mm
|
Height
1534
mm
|
Payload
395 - 435
kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
238 - 408
HP
|
Power HP
272 - 544
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.1
s
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Max Speed
200
km/h
|
Torque
420 - 670
Nm
|
Torque
343 - 686
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Power kW
175 - 325
kW
|
Power kW
200 - 400
kW
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
Top speed
200
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Polestar
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.