VS

Ford Transit Connect vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (122 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Connect or Renault Clio?

Ford Transit Connect vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Ford Transit Connect

details

Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Transit Connect

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Clio is substantially cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Ford Transit Connect costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,747 £.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers clearly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Ford Transit Connect takes 11.4 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Connect delivers significantly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.

Transit Connect

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Clio offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is noticeably lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 1,575 kg. The difference is around 373 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Connect carries substantially more – 780 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 317 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Ford Transit Connect
VW Caddy
VS
The Ford Transit Connect and the VW Caddy are two of the most popular compact vans for small businesses and urban operators, offering a practical mix of cargo space, fuel economy and maneuverability. Choose the Transit Connect if you want slightly more load flexibility and car-like driving …
Ford Transit Connect
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Transit Connect

The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.

details
98B296E7-C10F-4999-B4D2-428B46A9DF09
2018_FORD_TRANSIT_Kombi__18
2018_FORD_TRANSIT__12

Reviews Ford Transit Connect

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Renault Clio
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Comparing the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza means choosing between two of Europe's most capable superminis: the Clio leans stylish and comfortable, while the Ibiza focuses on sharp handling and value. This quick head-to-head will highlight differences in driving feel, space, efficiency and …
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Renault Clio and the Skoda Fabia are two of Europe's most sensible superminis, each offering a different balance of style, practicality and running costs. This comparison will help you decide whether the Clio’s polished drive and chic design or the Fabia’s roomier interior and everyday …
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
The Ford Puma and Renault Clio are two popular compact choices that blend city-friendly dimensions with striking style, yet they adopt different priorities in driving character and practicality. The Puma leans toward a higher-riding, crossover feel with clever boot and storage solutions, while the …
Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Transit Connect
VS
In the realm of versatile vans, the Ford Tourneo Connect and the Ford Transit Connect stand out as formidable contenders, each catering to different practical needs. The Tourneo Connect is lauded for its passenger-friendly design, offering a comfortable ride with ample seating and advanced …
Hyundai i20
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai i20 and the Renault Clio means weighing practical space and proven reliability against a more stylish, comfort-focused hatch. I'll compare their driving dynamics, interior quality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your everyday life.
Renault Clio
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Clio stands as a stalwart city car known for its efficiency, compact design, and affordability, making it a favorite for urban commuters. In contrast, the Renault Symbioz concept car offers a glimpse into the future of driving with its bold emphasis on autonomous technology, …
Ford Transit Connect
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
-
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
2
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,855 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
775 - 780 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
320 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
90 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Ford Transit Connect?

The Ford Transit Connect is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.