VS

Ford Transit Courier vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (136 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (20,700 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Courier or Mazda CX-80?

Ford Transit Courier vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Ford Transit Courier

  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
  • considerably lighter
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Transit Courier

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Transit Courier is considerably cheaper – starting at 20,700 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,673 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Transit Courier with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Transit Courier offers significantly more range – reaching up to 325 km, about 265 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 191 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers considerably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm more.

Transit Courier

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Courier is considerably lighter – 1,378 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 753 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Courier carries marginally more – 701 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 51 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Transit Courier is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £20,700
Transit Courier

Ford Transit Courier

  • Engine Type Petrol, Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 100 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 6.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 325 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Ford Transit Courier
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Transit Courier

The Ford Transit Courier is a compact, city-friendly van that hides surprising practicality behind a neat, no-nonsense exterior. Ideal for small businesses and urban runs, it pairs easy maneuverability and clever load solutions with a colleague-friendly driving position — proof that you don't need a giant van to get big jobs done.

details
98B296E7-C10F-4999-B4D2-428B46A9DF09
2018_FORD_TRANSIT_Kombi__18
2018_FORD_TRANSIT__12

Reviews Ford Transit Courier

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Ford Transit Connect
Ford Transit Courier
VS
In the world of compact commercial vehicles, the Ford Transit Connect and Ford Transit Courier each offer unique advantages tailored to different business needs. The Transit Connect boasts a larger cargo capacity and a more powerful engine lineup, making it ideal for those requiring additional …
Ford Tourneo Courier
Ford Transit Courier
VS
Ford Tourneo Courier and Ford Transit Courier go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford …
Ford Transit Courier
Peugeot Partner
VS
Ford Transit Courier and Peugeot Partner go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Transit …
Ford Transit Courier
VW Caddy
VS
In the bustling realm of compact commercial vehicles, the Ford Transit Courier and the VW Caddy are illustrious contenders. The Transit Courier shines with its nimble handling and budget-friendly price point, making it an appealing option for urban deliveries. In contrast, the VW Caddy impresses …
Hyundai Santa Fe
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique offerings. The Santa Fe impresses with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 captivates with its elegant design and sporty …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Ford Transit Courier
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
20,700 - 31,900 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
325 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 158 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,378 - 1,549 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
529 - 701 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 136 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
74 - 100 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Ford Transit Courier have?

The Ford Transit Courier is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.