VS

Ford Transit Custom Transporter vs Skoda Elroq comparison

Compare performance (286 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (49,700 £ vs 32,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Transporter or Skoda Elroq?

Ford Transit Custom Transporter vs Skoda Elroq: Key differences

Ford Transit Custom Transporter

details

Skoda Elroq

4.5 (14 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • slightly more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Transit Custom Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Elroq is considerably cheaper – starting at 32,000 £ , while the Ford Transit Custom Transporter costs 49,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,626 £.

Elroq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq offers slightly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 286 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers marginally more torque with 679 Nm compared to 630 Nm. That’s about 49 Nm more.

Transit Custom Transporter

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Transit Custom Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Elroq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £32,000
Elroq

Skoda Elroq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 441 - 574 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq are two different crossovers from Skoda that target distinct buyers: the Enyaq is a family-sized battery-electric SUV focused on range, cabin space and low running costs, while the Elroq is a smaller, more affordable compact crossover aimed at practical everyday use …
Skoda Elroq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the Skoda Elroq and the Skoda Epiq helps you weigh practical, compact crossover usability against a more spacious, tech-focused alternative from Skoda. I’ll highlight the key differences in space, efficiency, driving feel and ownership costs so you can pick the one that fits your needs.
Ford Transit Custom Transporter
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Transit Custom Transporter

The Transit Custom is a clever, no-nonsense workhorse that blends roomy practicality with surprisingly car-like driving manners, so your workday feels less like a chore and more like efficient transport. With a sensible interior, smart storage and tidy handling, it’s the kind of van that makes owners smile while they get on with the job — reliable, unfussy and built to keep moving.

details
98B296E7-C10F-4999-B4D2-428B46A9DF09
2018_FORD_TRANSIT_Kombi__18
2018_FORD_TRANSIT__12

Reviews Ford Transit Custom Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Elroq

The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.

details
1_skoda_elroq_166e0554
2_skoda_elroq_b393d405
28_skoda_elroq_3a5d05f5

Reviews Skoda Elroq

4.5 (14 Reviews)
rate

Overall, owners tend to view the Skoda Elroq positively as a well-equipped, comfortable and practical electric SUV that delivers good value and an intuitive, user-friendly layout. Typical praise highlights spaciousness, ride comfort and thoughtful design, while common negatives include occasional software/infotainment glitches, real-world range that can disappoint on regular highway use, and noticeable wind or road noise at higher speeds plus the need to reset some settings after start-up. Feedback on software reliability and range is mixed and seems to depend on driving patterns, so checking real-world range and software behavior for your typical use is advisable.

Werner
14 Sept 2026, 09:27:23

Skoda looks sportier.
Longtime Skoda driver

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Gerry
4 Sept 2026, 08:10:57

love it, thoroughly thought through. Well made, and ..yes it's clever..in so many ways! Ride and handling balance excellent feels so 'normal' to drive, and loads of room

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
NS
24 Aug 2026, 07:07:44

I drove the Cupra Tavascan and the Škoda Elroq, and after a test drive I ultimately chose the Škoda Elroq 85 Business Edition Advanced. I am very satisfied with the Škoda Elroq Business Edition Advanced. The car drives quietly and smoothly and feels nicely spacious. The controls are clear and the car has many useful features. All in all a pleasant and comfortable car that I enjoy driving. After a 7,200 km tour through Spain I'm still very satisfied with the Škoda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dingo
7 Aug 2026, 22:34:08

A good all-round car for anyone who can cough up €45,000. Essentially the proverbial jack-of-all-trades!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
MASSIMO
10 Jul 2026, 08:32:55

The Skoda Elroq is more maneuverable in the city, easier to park than a Tesla, it doesn’t suffer from curbs that sometimes touch the front, it handles steep, poorly made garage ramps without problems, uses traditional distance sensors that are very reliable, and it’s a European product.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Skoda Elroq offer contemporary takes on the small SUV segment, but they aim at different buyers — Volvo leans toward premium refinement while Skoda focuses on pragmatic value and space. This comparison will look at driving character, interior practicality, technology and running …
VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the VW ID.4 and the Skoda Elroq helps buyers choose between two practical electric compact SUVs from the Volkswagen Group that share much technology but deliver different character. I’ll focus on driving feel, interior space, features and value so you can pick the one that suits your …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
VW ID.3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the VW ID.3 and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a nimble, hatchback-style EV focused on urban driving or a slightly more spacious, crossover-style model prioritizing practicality. This comparison looks at range, interior space, driving feel and overall value to help …
Renault Scénic
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Renault Scenic and the Skoda Elroq are two compact, family-focused models that prioritize practicality and everyday comfort. I’ll compare them on space, efficiency, driving feel, equipment and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs best.
Hyundai IONIQ 5
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Hyundai IONIQ 5 and Skoda Elroq offer two distinct takes on the compact electric crossover: the IONIQ 5 shines with bold styling, rapid charging and advanced tech, while the Elroq prioritises practical space, sensible packaging and everyday usability. Your choice will hinge on whether you value …
Tesla Model Y
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Tesla Model Y is the slick Silicon Valley option — fast, long‑range and packed with over‑the‑air updates and a charging network that makes long trips effortless. The Škoda Elroq, by contrast, is Czech common sense on wheels: a more down‑to‑earth, better‑value family car with clever packaging …
CUPRA Born
Skoda Elroq
VS
Here’s a side-by-side look at the CUPRA Born and the Skoda Elroq, two fresh electric models from the Volkswagen Group that target different buyers. The Born delivers a sporty, driver-focused hatchback experience, while the Elroq is a compact, practical crossover prioritizing interior space and …
Ford Transit Custom Transporter
Skoda Elroq

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,700 - 77,400 £
Price
32,000 - 47,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
441 - 574 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
3 - 6
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
-
Curb weight
2,036 - 2,255 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
470 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,032 mm
Width
1,884 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
-
Payload
482 - 549 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 - 286 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
100 - 210 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Ford Transit Custom Transporter?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.