Compare performance (269 HP vs 138 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Kia Niro?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Kia Niro is significantly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 38,175 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers significantly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers markedly more torque with 430 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 165 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsThe Kia Niro is a practical crossover that blends economy and everyday versatility without sacrificing comfort. With a roomy, well-laid-out cabin and calm, composed handling, it’s an easy-to-live-with choice for commuters and families.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
102 - 111 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,474 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
451 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
138 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
102 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Kia
|