Compare performance (269 HP vs 190 HP), boot space and price (67,300 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Transporter or Skoda Karoq?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Karoq is considerably cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 38,227 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers clearly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 190 HP. That’s roughly 79 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers a bit more torque with 430 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Transporter is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsSkoda Karoq is a smartly packaged compact SUV that balances practical family-friendly space with composed handling, making daily drives feel easy and assured. Its straightforward design, roomy cabin with clever storage solutions, and sensible equipment make it a strong choice for buyers seeking value and versatility without fuss.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
Price
29,100 - 41,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
128 - 173 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,655 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
521 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
Width
1,841 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
456 - 549 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|