Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
GWM ORA 03 vs Hyundai Kona - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (171 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (33400 £ vs 23100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 03 or Hyundai Kona?
Kona
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Hyundai Kona has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £ , while the GWM ORA 03 costs 33400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10363 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Hyundai Kona: with 14.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s to a small extent more efficient than the GWM ORA 03 with 16.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.90 kWh.
As for electric range, the Hyundai Kona performs a bit better – achieving up to 514 km, about 94 km more than the GWM ORA 03.
Kona
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona has a noticeable edge – offering 218 HP compared to 171 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the GWM ORA 03 takes 8.20 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Hyundai Kona performs evident better – reaching 210 km/h, while the GWM ORA 03 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Hyundai Kona pulls minimal stronger with 265 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kona
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Hyundai Kona is slightly lighter – 1370 kg compared to 1615 kg. The difference is around 245 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers convincingly more room – 466 L compared to 228 L. That’s a difference of about 238 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Hyundai Kona performs evident better – up to 1300 L, which is about 442 L more than the GWM ORA 03.
When it comes to payload, Hyundai Kona clearly perceptible takes the win – 490 kg compared to 355 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Hyundai Kona holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
GWM ORA 03
Hyundai Kona
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £23,100
Hyundai Kona
GWM ORA 03
4.7 (1 Reviews)
The ORA 03 is a cheeky, design-led electric compact that pairs bold looks with a surprisingly practical interior, giving buyers a fresh alternative to the usual sober choices. It’s easy to live with day-to-day thanks to clever packaging, modern tech and city-friendly manners, so shoppers after an affordable EV with personality should put the ORA 03 on their shortlist.
detailsHyundai Kona
5 (1 Reviews)
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
GWM ORA 03
Hyundai Kona
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33400 - 42400 £
|
Price
23100 - 41600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
310 - 420 km
|
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45.4 - 59.3 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1615 - 1655 kg
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
228 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
4235 - 4254 mm
|
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
|
|
Width
1825 - 1848 mm
|
Width
1825 mm
|
|
Height
1603 mm
|
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
858 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
|
|
Payload
315 - 355 kg
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
171 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 8.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
126 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
|
|
Brand
GWM
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
What drivetrain options does the GWM ORA 03 have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.