Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Honda CR-V vs Renault Arkana comparison
Compare performance (184 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda CR-V or Renault Arkana?
Honda CR-V vs Renault Arkana: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CR-V
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Arkana is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,314 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda CR-V uses 2.6 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
Arkana
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Honda CR-V offers markedly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Honda CR-V is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 9 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda CR-V delivers clearly more torque with 335 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm more.
CR-V
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is markedly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,821 kg. The difference is around 311 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Honda CR-V carries barely more – 475 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Honda CR-V is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,800
Honda CR-V
Honda CR-V
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Honda CR-V
The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.
details
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Honda CR-V
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42,800 - 52,100 £
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
78 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
59 - 152 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,866 mm
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
439 - 475 kg
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
335 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
135 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.