VS

Honda CR-V vs Skoda Kamiq comparison

Compare performance (184 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 22,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda CR-V or Skoda Kamiq?

Honda CR-V vs Skoda Kamiq: Key differences

Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • noticeably more trunk space

Skoda Kamiq

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CR-V

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Kamiq is significantly cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,503 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda CR-V uses 2.6 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.

Kamiq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Honda CR-V offers slightly more power – delivering 184 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda CR-V delivers markedly more torque with 335 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm more.

CR-V

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is clearly lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,821 kg. The difference is around 590 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers noticeably more boot space – 617 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 217 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries slightly more – 539 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 64 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Honda CR-V is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,800
CR-V

Honda CR-V

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 78 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
If you want a brilliant little hatch that’s cheap to run, slips into tight parking and keeps boot space sensible, the Skoda Fabia is the clever everyday choice; the Skoda Kamiq, by contrast, dresses the same sensible Skoda DNA in a taller, more family-friendly crossover body with extra ride height …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Kamiq

The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.

details
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688

Reviews Skoda Kamiq

5 (5 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Between the sporty, streetwise SEAT Arona and the sensible Škoda Kamiq, the Arona wins hearts with sharper styling and a livelier chassis that makes every corner a little more fun. The Kamiq, however, is the adult in the room — smarter storage, a bigger boot and a calmer cabin, the pragmatic choice …
Skoda Kamiq
VW Taigo
VS
In the compact crossover ring the Skoda Kamiq plays the sensible everyman—generous boot, clever storage and frugal engines—while the VW Taigo strikes a pose with coupe‑like styling and a slightly livelier, more characterful drive. If you need practical space and everyday value, pick the Kamiq; if …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Skoda Kamiq
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Skoda Kamiq and Toyota Yaris Cross both offer compelling options for urban drivers. The Kamiq impresses with its spacious interior and practicality, while the Yaris Cross stands out for its hybrid efficiency and dynamic handling. Ultimately, the choice …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda CR‑V is the sensible family SUV — cavernous boot, comfortable ride and rock‑solid reliability that keeps running costs down, while the Volvo XC40 tempts you with Scandi styling, cutting‑edge safety tech and a more premium, tactile cabin. Choose the CR‑V for everyday practicality and …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Honda CR-V
Lexus NX
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Lexus NX stand out for their unique strengths. While the CR-V impresses with its spacious interior and fuel efficiency, the Lexus NX offers a more luxurious feel and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 52,100 £
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
78 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 - 152 g/km
co2
121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
-
Length
4,241 mm
Width
1,866 mm
Width
1,793 mm
Height
-
Height
1,562 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,395 L
Payload
439 - 475 kg
Payload
439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
Torque
335 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Honda
Brand
Skoda
Is the Honda CR-V offered with different drivetrains?

The Honda CR-V is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.