Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Honda HR-V vs Volvo XC60 comparison
Compare performance (131 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (29,700 £ vs 49,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda HR-V or Volvo XC60?
Honda HR-V vs Volvo XC60: Key differences
Honda HR-V
4.3 (15 Reviews)
Overall, owners tend to find the Honda HR‑V a practical, reliable and economical compact SUV that’s easy to live with in town and for family duties, offering predictable handling and a comfortable ride. Common positives include good fuel economy, roomy/intuive packaging and reassuring manners; common negatives some owners mention are noticeable noise under brisk acceleration or low‑speed maneuvers and a tendency to feel underpowered on sustained highway runs. So while feedback is broadly favorable for city and everyday use, opinions are more mixed on long‑distance refinement — worth a motorway run during your test drive if that’s your regular terrain.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
HR-V
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Honda HR-V is considerably cheaper – starting at 29,700 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,449 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 2.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Honda HR-V with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.
XC60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers substantially more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 324 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Honda HR-V takes 10.6 s. That’s about 5.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers substantially more torque with 709 Nm compared to 253 Nm. That’s about 456 Nm more.
HR-V
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Honda HR-V is markedly lighter – 1,452 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 448 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers visibly more boot space – 483 L compared to 319 L. That’s a difference of about 164 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries visibly more – 550 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 132 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo XC60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,200
Volvo XC60
Honda HR-V
Volvo XC60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Honda HR-V
The Honda HR-V is the sensible compact crossover that blends roomy practicality with a composed, friendly drive, making it an easy pick for buyers who want everyday usability without fuss. It won’t thrill hardcore enthusiasts, but its clever packaging, comfortable cabin and low-key styling make life simpler — and that’s exactly the point.
details
Volvo XC60
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
Honda HR-V
Volvo XC60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,700 - 35,400 £
|
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
122 g/km
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,452 kg
|
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
319 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,708 mm
|
|
Width
-
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,655 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
|
|
Payload
418 kg
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
131 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 - 10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
253 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
96 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.