VS

Honda Jazz vs Skoda Kamiq comparison

Compare performance (122 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23100 £ vs 21700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda Jazz or Skoda Kamiq?

Jazz

Honda Jazz vs Skoda Kamiq: A Comprehensive Comparison

When it comes to choosing a compact vehicle, both the Honda Jazz and Skoda Kamiq present themselves as prominent options. Each vehicle caters to a different segment of the market with unique attributes and capabilities. In this article, we will delve into the technical aspects, innovations, and overall driving experiences of both models to help you make an informed decision.

Kamiq

Body Type and Design

The Honda Jazz is a hatchback that prioritizes compactness and versatility, making it an ideal city car. Its design emphasizes practicality, featuring a sleek profile along with an inviting interior that focuses on maximizing space for occupants and cargo alike.

In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq is classified as an SUV, which brings a higher driving position and a sense of ruggedness to its aesthetic. The Kamiq's design includes sharper lines and a more aggressive stance, which appeals to those looking for a more adventurous style without moving to a larger SUV.

Jazz

Engine and Performance

The Honda Jazz utilizes a Full Hybrid engine with a capacity of 1498 cm³, generating a power output of 122 HP and 253 Nm of torque. Its powertrain is paired with a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT), ideal for achieving smooth acceleration. The 0-100 km/h acceleration time ranges between 9.4 and 9.7 seconds, and it offers a maximum speed of 175 km/h. Additionally, with a fuel consumption rate between 4.5 to 4.8 L/100km, the Jazz stands out for its efficiency, making it a suitable option for eco-conscious drivers.

The Skoda Kamiq, on the other hand, provides a selection of petrol engines with varying power outputs: 95 HP, 115 HP, and an impressive 150 HP option. The engine capacity ranges from 999 cm³ (for the base engine) to 1498 cm³. The Kamiq's performance can also be tailored with manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, enhancing the driving experience. It offers quicker acceleration, with the most powerful version achieving 0-100 km/h in just 8.3 seconds and topping out at a remarkable 214 km/h. Fuel consumption is slightly higher at around 5.4 to 5.7 L/100km but still reasonable for a compact SUV.

Kamiq

Interior Comfort and Technology

Both the Honda Jazz and Skoda Kamiq place emphasis on passenger comfort and technological integration. The Jazz is equipped with a spacious interior, designed with Honda's innovative Magic Seat system that allows for various seating configurations and cargo space maximization, boasting a trunk capacity of 304 liters.

The Kamiq offers a slightly larger trunk capacity at 400 liters, making it more practical for carrying larger loads. Inside, it features modern technological amenities, including a user-friendly infotainment system with smartphone connectivity, and top-tier safety features that align with the current automotive standards.

Jazz

Safety Features and Ratings

Safety is paramount in modern vehicles, and both models excel in this aspect. The Honda Jazz is equipped with Honda Sensing technologies, which include collision mitigation braking, lane keeping assist, and adaptive cruise control. These features contribute to its high safety ratings.

The Skoda Kamiq doesn’t fall short either, offering a comprehensive suite of driver-assistance features like adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring, and automatic emergency braking. Both cars have received commendable safety ratings, ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.

Kamiq

Driving Experience

The driving experience in the Honda Jazz is smooth and responsive, particularly well-suited for urban environments. The hybrid engine provides instant torque, making city driving feel effortless while delivering excellent fuel efficiency. Furthermore, the CVT transmission ensures seamless acceleration without noticeable shifts.

Meanwhile, the Skoda Kamiq is designed for versatility, smoothly transitioning from city roads to more challenging terrains. The higher driving position provides better road visibility, and it feels more robust compared to the Jazz. The performance of its automatic transmissions is precise, allowing for sportier driving when needed.

Jazz

Final Thoughts

In summary, both the Honda Jazz and Skoda Kamiq have their own unique strengths and appeal. The Jazz emerges as the frontrunner in fuel efficiency and innovative space utilization, appealing to drivers seeking an economical and practical vehicle. On the other hand, the Kamiq solidifies its place with superior trunk space and a sporty SUV design, catering to those in need of versatility without compromising style.

Your choice between these two models will ultimately depend on your lifestyle preferences, driving habits, and space requirements. Both vehicles offer remarkable value in the compact segment, ensuring you are well-served, whichever model you choose.

Honda Jazz vs Skoda Kamiq: Key differences

Honda Jazz

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more efficient

Skoda Kamiq

5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • slight cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • slightly quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • minimal lighter
  • evident more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kamiq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Kamiq has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21700 £ , while the Honda Jazz costs 23100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1389 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Honda Jazz manages with 4.50 L and is therefore somewhat more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.30 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

Jazz

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq has a slightly edge – offering 150 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the Honda Jazz takes 9.40 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Honda Jazz pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 253 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 3 Nm difference.

Kamiq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is minimal lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1302 kg. The difference is around 71 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kamiq offers evident more room – 400 L compared to 304 L. That’s a difference of about 96 L.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq distinct takes the win – 539 kg compared to 388 kg. That’s a difference of about 151 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kamiq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Honda Jazz
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £21,700
Kamiq

Skoda Kamiq

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.3 - 5.7 L

Honda Jazz

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate

The Honda Jazz is a supremely practical small hatch that hides clever packaging and more usable space than it lets on, with friendly styling and an unfussy charm. It’s economical to run, easy to park and perfect for buyers who want reliable, versatile daily motoring without the hassle.

details

Skoda Kamiq

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.

details
Honda Jazz
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption

Price
23100 - 26700 £
Price
21700 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.8 L
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
102 - 108 g/km
co2
121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1302 - 1321 kg
Curb weight
1231 - 1340 kg
Trunk capacity
304 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
-
Length
4241 mm
Width
-
Width
1793 mm
Height
-
Height
1562 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1395 L
Payload
369 - 388 kg
Payload
439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
Torque
253 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
90 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Honda
Brand
Skoda
Is the Honda Jazz offered with different drivetrains?

The Honda Jazz is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.