Compare performance (122 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda Jazz or Toyota C-HR?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of compact cars, finding a vehicle that fits your lifestyle and driving preferences can be a thrilling yet daunting task. Two contenders that often appear on the shortlist of many potential buyers are the Honda Jazz and the Toyota C-HR. This head-to-head comparison will delve into their technical aspects and innovations to help you make an informed choice.
The Honda Jazz is a hatchback renowned for its practicality and space efficiency. With a length ranging from 4089mm to 4105mm and a height between 1526mm and 1556mm, it offers compact dimensions suitable for urban environments. Its trunk capacity of 304 liters may seem modest but is complemented by the versatile Magic Seats system, allowing users to maximize storage space.
In contrast, the Toyota C-HR embraces an SUV body style, reflecting a bolder and more aggressive stance on the road. It measures 4362mm in length, 1832mm in width, and a height of 1558mm to 1564mm. With a trunk capacity ranging from 350 to 447 liters, it edges out the Jazz in terms of cargo space, catering well to those needing extra storage for adventures and shopping sprees alike.
The Honda Jazz is powered by a full hybrid engine with 122 HP, providing a blend of performance and efficiency. It's equipped with a continuously variable transmission (CVT) and is a front-wheel drive, achieving a top speed of 175 km/h and reaching 0-100 km/h in around 9.4 to 9.7 seconds. Its fuel consumption is impressively low, ranging from 4.5 to 4.8 L/100km, making it an economical choice for the conscious driver.
The Toyota C-HR offers more variety in its powertrain with both full hybrid and plug-in hybrid options. Its horsepower ranges from 140 to 223 HP, depending on the model, and it can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in 7.4 to 9.9 seconds. With the plug-in hybrid variant, it offers an electric range of up to 68 kilometers, significantly lowering fuel consumption to as low as 0.8 L/100km. The option for an all-wheel-drive enhances its appeal for those needing extra traction.
The Honda Jazz showcases its innovative spirit with the Magic Seats feature, allowing for multiple seating configurations to maximize interior space utility. Its hybrid system ensures smooth and efficient driving, paired with modern infotainment options that keep drivers connected on the move.
Toyota's C-HR stands out with its futuristic design and hybrid synergy drive technology, renowned for its reliability and efficiency. The C-HR’s infotainment system integrates seamlessly into the driving experience, featuring a user-friendly interface. The plug-in hybrid variant also provides an eco-friendly option for urban commuting, emphasizing Toyota's commitment to sustainable driving solutions.
Choosing between the Honda Jazz and Toyota C-HR hinges on your individual priorities. The Jazz excels in offering a compact, efficient option for city driving with clever use of space. On the other hand, the C-HR combines a bolder design, a versatile powertrain array, and technological advancements, appealing to those seeking style with substance. Both vehicles bring commendable strengths to the table, ensuring that either choice will enrich your driving experience.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Honda Jazz is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,034 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Honda Jazz with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers significantly more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 101 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Honda Jazz takes 9.4 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Honda Jazz is slightly lighter – 1,302 kg compared to 1,505 kg. The difference is around 203 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR offers clearly more boot space – 447 L compared to 304 L. That’s a difference of about 143 L.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR carries barely more – 425 kg compared to 388 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.
The Toyota C-HR stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Honda Jazz is a supremely practical small hatch that hides clever packaging and more usable space than it lets on, with friendly styling and an unfussy charm. It’s economical to run, easy to park and perfect for buyers who want reliable, versatile daily motoring without the hassle.
details
The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,100 - 26,700 £
|
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 108 g/km
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,302 - 1,321 kg
|
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
304 L
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
-
|
Width
1,832 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
369 - 388 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
253 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España