Compare performance (184 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (35,100 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda ZR-V or Mazda CX-60?
In the ever-evolving SUV market, the Honda ZR-V and Mazda CX-60 stand out as two formidable contenders. Both models hail from brands renowned for their innovation and engineering excellence. Today, we take a detailed look into the technical realms of these two vehicles, comparing their performance, tech features, and overall value proposition.
The Honda ZR-V, a compact SUV propelled by a full hybrid engine, produces 184 HP with a power output of 135 kW. It offers front-wheel drive dynamics, promising fuel efficiency with a consumption rate of 5.7 to 5.8 L/100 km, and a CO2 efficiency class D. This eco-friendly cruiser achieves a top speed of 173 km/h with a smooth acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just under 8 seconds.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-60 steps up the game with a blend of plug-in hybrid and diesel MHEV powertrains. The plug-in hybrid variant impresses with 327 HP and a maximum torque of 500 Nm. This powerhouse hits 100 km/h from a standstill in just 5.8 seconds, reaching a maximum speed of 200 km/h. It's a versatile performer available in both all-wheel and rear-wheel drive configurations, offering a commendable electric range of 64 km and superior fuel economy of 1.4 L/100 km in its hybrid iteration.
When it comes to dimensions, the ZR-V measures 4568 mm in length, 1840 mm in width, and 1613 mm in height, making it a compact yet spacious option for urban adventures. With a trunk capacity of up to 380 liters, it provides ample cargo space for daily needs while maintaining a manageable curb weight of around 1675 kg.
Meanwhile, the CX-60 is larger, boasting an impressive length of 4745 mm, width of 1890 mm, and height ranging up to 1688 mm. With a substantial trunk capacity of 570 liters, it caters well to family travels and longer hauls. Its curb weight varies between 1890 kg to 2055 kg, reflective of its robust build.
The Honda ZR-V incorporates modern hybrid technology to provide both power and efficiency, ensuring a balanced driving experience that leans towards sustainability. Its full hybrid system is designed to optimize fuel use, and it comes loaded with Honda's signature safety and connectivity features to enhance driver and passenger experiences.
Mazda's CX-60 showcases multifaceted innovations with its plugin hybrid capability, allowing drivers to enjoy both electric and traditional propulsion. This dual nature is supplemented by Mazda's i-Activsense safety suite, offering cutting-edge safety technologies, alongside a luxurious interior equipped with high-end infotainment systems designed for the tech-savvy driver.
Ultimately, choosing between the Honda ZR-V and the Mazda CX-60 depends on the blend of power, efficiency, and tech-rich features a driver desires. Honda’s ZR-V offers a friendly and efficient hybrid driving experience ideal for urban settings, while Mazda’s CX-60, with its powerful hybrid options and larger frame, appeals to those seeking a more dynamic drive blending luxury and technology. Both models exemplify the innovation and craftsmanship that both brands are famous for, promising a fulfilling ownership experience.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Honda ZR-V is visibly cheaper – starting at 35,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,614 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Honda ZR-V with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 143 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Honda ZR-V takes 7.8 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers significantly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 315 Nm. That’s about 235 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Honda ZR-V is moderately lighter – 1,660 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 230 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries visibly more – 612 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 157 kg.
The Mazda CX-60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Honda ZR-V blends smart practicality with sharper styling than you might expect, giving buyers a calm, competent companion for daily life. Inside it's comfortable and cleverly laid out, easy to live with and never trying too hard to be exciting.
details
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
35,100 - 38,700 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
130 - 132 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,660 - 1,710 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
440 - 455 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
315 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
135 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España