VS

Hyundai Bayon vs Skoda Kamiq comparison

Compare performance (90 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (20,500 £ vs 22,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Bayon or Skoda Kamiq?

Hyundai Bayon vs Skoda Kamiq: Key differences

Hyundai Bayon

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
  • barely more trunk space
details

Skoda Kamiq

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Bayon

Quick look: Hyundai Bayon VS Skoda Kamiq

Hyundai Bayon and Skoda Kamiq sit in the same compact‑SUV space but answer different buyer questions: the Bayon prioritises straightforward value and an exceptionally usable boot, while the Kamiq pushes for roomy rear seats and a calmer highway demeanour. The Bayon feels like a no‑nonsense, budget‑savvy choice with clear controls and practical packaging, whereas the Kamiq trades a little nip in price for more passenger space and a quieter cabin. Both are easy to live with day‑to‑day, yet the compromises they make diverge sharply when you leave the city. Read on for where each car actually shines for real owners, rather than spec sheets.

Kamiq

Driving character and usability in daily traffic

The Hyundai Bayon drives with light, friendly controls that make urban chores and tight parking noticeably easier, while the Skoda Kamiq leans toward composed, predictable responses that reward steady cruising more than sporty inputs. Bayon’s drivetrain and automatic behaviour are tuned for smoothness and simplicity, which can feel slow off the line, whereas Kamiq’s setup offers more shove and a steadier transmission rhythm but never pretends to be sporty. In town the Bayon’s steering and pedals feel more forgiving; on mixed roads the Kamiq’s planted manners and better torque delivery give a more relaxed experience. Choose Bayon if you prioritise city ease and fuss‑free operation; pick Kamiq if you want a more assured partner for longer, varied drives.

Bayon

Comfort and long‑distance behavior

On longer trips the Skoda Kamiq shows its strengths: a quieter interior, a steadier ride over motorway surfaces and rear seats that welcome taller passengers without complaint. The Hyundai Bayon remains comfortable for its class but transmits more sharpness from road imperfections and the cabin hum rises sooner at sustained speeds. Both offer sensible ergonomics up front, but Kamiq’s greater rear legroom and calmer noise levels make it the better long‑distance companion for families or frequent motorway users. If your driving is split between town and long runs, the Kamiq reduces fatigue; if most miles are short hops, the Bayon’s comfort is perfectly acceptable and more city‑tuned.

Kamiq

Practicality and everyday usability

Practical needs sharpen the contrast: the Hyundai Bayon impresses with a very usable boot layout and intuitive physical controls that make loading, plugging in phones and adjusting climate quick and simple. The Skoda Kamiq counters with clever cubbyholes, smarter little details and a more generous rear cabin that improves everyday life for rear‑seat passengers. Bayon’s simplicity is a real advantage for buyers who want immediate, no‑fuss ergonomics and easy access to luggage, while Kamiq rewards those who prioritise passenger space and thoughtful storage over the last litre of boot volume. Bear in mind that some of Kamiq’s best convenience features appear only above entry trim, whereas Bayon leans into value as standard.

Bayon

Cabin feel and perceived quality

Neither car attempts to be premium, but they feel different in character: the Hyundai Bayon is functional and cleanly put together, leaving you aware of hard plastics but reassured by robust assembly and sensible button layouts. The Skoda Kamiq tends to feel more mature in the cabin — slightly better room distribution and a few more tasteful touches — though it still shows hard surfaces in lower trims. Infotainment responsiveness and phone pairing can be temperamental in both, so expect real‑world hiccups unless you step up the spec level. If tactile finesse and a quieter shell matter to you, Kamiq leans closer to that; if easy operation and straightforward build matter more, Bayon delivers without fuss.

Kamiq

Buyer fit: who should pick which car?

Choose the Hyundai Bayon if you want a compact SUV that excels in city life, gives you a really practical boot and keeps running costs and purchase price visibly lower while offering fuss‑free controls and a long warranty. Opt for the Skoda Kamiq if rear passenger space, low noise on the motorway and a more composed long‑distance experience are priorities, and you’re willing to pay a bit more for those everyday comforts. Both cars suit pragmatic buyers, but Bayon skews toward value‑conscious urban families and first‑time SUV buyers, whereas Kamiq fits small families or commuters who favour space and refinement. The technical comparison that follows will make those trade‑offs concrete in areas like power delivery, consumption and luggage geometry so you can match figures to your real needs.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai i20
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Bayon and the Hyundai i20 comes down to whether you prefer a compact crossover with higher ride height and extra practicality (Bayon) or a sharper, more efficient hatchback with sportier handling (i20). I’ll compare their space, driving feel, fuel economy and equipment …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Bayon

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Hyundai Bayon is barely cheaper – starting at 20,500 £ , while the Skoda Kamiq costs 22,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,783 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kamiq uses 5.3 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Hyundai Bayon with 5.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

Kamiq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq offers markedly more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 90 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kamiq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Hyundai Bayon takes 11.9 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kamiq delivers clearly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 172 Nm. That’s about 78 Nm more.

Bayon

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Bayon is very slightly lighter – 1,175 kg compared to 1,231 kg. The difference is around 56 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Bayon offers barely more boot space – 411 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 11 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kamiq carries slightly more – 539 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kamiq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,300
Kamiq

Skoda Kamiq

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
details
Hyundai Bayon
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Hyundai Bayon

The Hyundai Bayon slips neatly between city runabout and small SUV, offering surprising practicality and a fresh, confident design that stands out in urban traffic. It's an easy buy for shoppers who want smart packaging, tidy handling and a dash of personality without fuss — a sensible little crossover that makes everyday driving a bit more enjoyable.

details
hyundai-all-new-bayon-static-01
hyundai-all-new-bayon-static-02
hyundai-all-new-bayon-static-08
hyundai-all-new-bayon-interior-01
hyundai-all-new-bayon-details-06

Reviews Hyundai Bayon

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Janusz
29 Apr 2026, 09:15:55

Definitely the Hyundai Bayon — the most important thing is the simply designed 1.2 MPI four-cylinder engine, 84 hp, adapted for LPG and cheap to repair, beautiful looks, a five-year warranty, cheaper to buy, and performance completely sufficient for a senior. A four-cylinder engine runs smoother and is better refined. I will buy this car in December 2026 at the Hyundai dealership in Toruń.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
André CGARLIER
20 Jan 2026, 19:35:46

I bought the HUNDAY BAYON one month ago.
600 km later, first small problem — the gauge stopped working.
I have an appointment set for 15 days from now. That said, it’s a real pleasure to drive: very smooth, lively acceleration, comfortable and perfect visibility. 800 km on the clock, but I’ve noticed city fuel consumption is much higher than advertised — 9.7 litres/100 km, mostly urban driving.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Kamiq

The Skoda Kamiq is a practical, well-built small crossover that mixes city-friendly manners with surprisingly versatile interior space and clever storage solutions. It offers a comfortable ride, user-friendly technology and solid value, making it a sensible choice for everyday driving.

details
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688

Reviews Skoda Kamiq

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
Reg
19 Jul 2026, 13:56:09

Roomy nice ride well made reliable very good value

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW Taigo
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW Taigo? Both are compact crossovers aimed at urban buyers, but the Kamiq emphasizes practicality, interior space and value while the Taigo favors sporty styling and a slightly sharper driving feel—this comparison will help you choose which suits your needs.
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Epiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the Skoda Epiq comes down to whether you want compact, city-friendly practicality or a more modern, feature-focused package. This brief comparison highlights the key differences in space, efficiency, tech and driving character so you can decide which suits your …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
The Skoda Kamiq is a city‑friendly crossover that trades a bit of sportiness for higher seating, clever storage tricks and SUV looks — great if you want practical versatility and a confident view of the road. The Skoda Scala, meanwhile, is the sharper, more car‑like hatchback with better driving …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Fabia and Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prefer a practical, efficient supermini or a taller, more versatile compact crossover. The Fabia excels for city driving and low running costs, while the Kamiq offers extra interior space, a higher driving position and …
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona are closely related compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a small SUV, but they take different approaches to size, style and capability. This comparison will help you decide whether the Bayon’s city-focused practicality and value or the Kona’s wider engine …
Skoda Kamiq
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Deciding between the Skoda Kamiq and the Suzuki Vitara? This quick, no-nonsense comparison focuses on real-world space, practicality, running costs and driving feel to show which crossover suits your everyday needs.
Kia XCeed
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Comparing the Kia XCeed and Skoda Kamiq highlights two different takes on the small crossover market: the XCeed brings a sportier, hatchback‑derived profile and sharper driving manners, while the Kamiq prioritises practicality, interior space and everyday value. If you want style and driving …
SEAT Ateca
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The SEAT Ateca and Skoda Kamiq are two popular compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Ateca leans toward a roomier, more driver-focused experience while the Kamiq prioritizes city-friendly practicality and efficiency. This comparison will focus on space, driving dynamics, equipment and …
Hyundai Bayon
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
Price
20,500 - 26,200 £
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
130 - 132 g/km
co2
121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,175 - 1,200 kg
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
Trunk capacity
411 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,775 mm
Width
1,793 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 460 kg
Payload
439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
90 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.9 - 13.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
172 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
66 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Hyundai Bayon?

The Hyundai Bayon is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.