VS

Hyundai Kona vs KGM Rexton comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or KGM Rexton?

Hyundai Kona vs KGM Rexton: Key differences

Hyundai Kona

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • barely more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly lighter
details

KGM Rexton

  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Hyundai Kona is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the KGM Rexton costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 17,563 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the KGM Rexton with 8.2 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.

Rexton

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers barely more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the KGM Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Rexton delivers noticeably more torque with 441 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 176 Nm more.

Kona

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: KGM Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Kona is significantly lighter – 1,370 kg compared to 2,070 kg. The difference is around 700 kg.

Looking at boot space, the KGM Rexton offers considerably more boot space – 784 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 318 L.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Rexton carries considerably more – 845 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 355 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Hyundai Kona is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Kona

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 204 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.6 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 380 - 510 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Toyota Yaris Cross are two leading subcompact crossover SUVs that suit buyers wanting compact size, efficient powertrains and easy city driving. This comparison looks at how the Kona and Yaris Cross differ in driving feel, interior space, practicality and ownership costs so you …
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Škoda Elroq are close rivals in the small-to-compact SUV segment — this quick comparison will help you spot the practical differences that matter. The Kona is a nimble, tech-rich option with multiple powertrain choices (including electric), while the Elroq prioritizes …
Hyundai Kona
KGM Rexton

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg

Reviews Hyundai Kona

4.6 (9 Reviews)
rate
OLGA
12 Jun 2026, 00:41:55

I feel very safe driving the Kona. I’ve been driving since I was 24 and I’m 76. I’ve had many brands — BMW X3, BMW X5, Ford, Peugeot, Renault — all very good brands, but the Kona seduced me and I don’t want to change; it’s just that the 2026 version isn’t coming into Argentina.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul Corkish
8 Jun 2026, 11:47:29

About to buy my new 3rd Kona (2nd N line Hybrid)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Austin
21 May 2026, 19:30:33

Better fit for is 6'3" people

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
TOTO
20 May 2026, 11:23:42

The Kona is an SUV that delivers, especially in terms of driving comfort. It's noticeably easier to get into and settle into as you get older. Less feisty than the MG4 but slightly more economical.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans
23 Apr 2026, 11:02:05

More modern car with much more advanced technology than the S-Cross. The S-Cross is functional, economical and good, but dated.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

KGM Rexton

The Rexton is a roomy, rugged SUV that prioritizes comfort and practical utility, making it a sensible choice for families and buyers who need genuine off-road capability. It offers solid refinement and a generous equipment level for the money, though the brand still trails more mainstream rivals in recognition.

details
serpimg_PlZ613

Reviews KGM Rexton

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Kona
Kia EV2
VS
Here’s a head-to-head look at the Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV2, two compact crossovers that aim to deliver efficient electric driving with practical everyday usability. I’ll compare the essentials—range, charging, interior space, driving feel and running costs—so you can pick the one that fits your …
Hyundai Kona
Kia EV3
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia EV3 comes down to whether you prefer a well-established compact crossover with a proven track record or a newer electric contender focused on efficiency and modern tech. I’ll walk you through how they compare across range, practicality, driving feel and …
Hyundai Kona
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Welcome to DriveDuel’s compact-SUV throwdown: the cheeky, city-savvy Hyundai Kona goes head-to-head with the sensible, grown-up Nissan Qashqai to see which one should park in your life. Expect feisty styling and nimble urban manners from the Kona, measured space and comfort from the Qashqai — we’ll …
Hyundai Kona
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Hyundai Kona and the Renault Symbioz represent two very different visions of mobility: the Kona is a compact, practical crossover you can buy today, while the Symbioz is Renault’s futuristic concept car showcasing autonomous, connected electric technologies. If you want an affordable, …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona are closely related compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a small SUV, but they take different approaches to size, style and capability. This comparison will help you decide whether the Bayon’s city-focused practicality and value or the Kona’s wider engine …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Niro
VS
The Hyundai Kona and Kia Niro are two popular compact crossovers that appeal to buyers deciding between sportier looks and practical efficiency. Though they share similar underpinnings and offer hybrid and electric options, they differ in driving dynamics, interior space, and feature priorities — …
Hyundai Kona
Kia XCeed
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and the Kia XCeed is like picking between a sprightly city fox and a composed urban hatchback with SUV vibes — both promise personality, practicality and sensible running costs without breaking the bank. The Kona delivers cheeky styling and punchy handling for …
Hyundai Kona
KGM Rexton

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,600 - 41,900 £
Price
41,100 - 50,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
8.2 - 8.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
216 - 219 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,105 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,960 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
730 - 845 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Power HP
202 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
441 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Power kW
149 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
KGM
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.