@ Hyundai Motor Company
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Hyundai Kona vs Mazda CX-30 – Which car suits you better?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Mazda CX-30?

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

When it comes to compact SUVs, the Hyundai Kona and Mazda CX-30 have emerged as two of the most attractive options on the market. Both vehicles boast a plethora of advanced technical features and innovations that promise a delightful driving experience. In this article, we’ll delve into how these two vehicles stack up against each other in various critical aspects, helping you decide which compact SUV suits your needs better.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Design and Practicality

The Hyundai Kona features a bold design with sharp angles and a distinctive front fascia, making it an eye-catching option on the road. It measures 4,350 mm in length, with a width of 1,825 mm and a height of 1,585 mm, offering a spacious cargo area of 466 liters. The Kona also has a practical five-door configuration, seating up to five occupants comfortably.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 sports a more elegant and refined design, with smoother lines and a more upscale appearance. It is slightly longer at 4,395 mm and has a width of 1,795 mm and a height of 1,540 mm, which contributes to its striking profile. The CX-30 offers a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 430 liters but still provides adequate space for everyday use. Both vehicles have a five-door layout, ensuring easy access for passengers.

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Performance and Efficiency

Under the hood, the Hyundai Kona offers multiple engine options, including petrol, full hybrid, and electric variants, with power outputs ranging from 100 to an impressive 218 HP. The Kona is versatile, allowing buyers to choose from front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive configurations. Additionally, it showcases a low fuel consumption rate, with petrol engines averaging between 5.7 to 6.7 L/100km, and an electric range of up to 514 km on a single charge for electric models. The acceleration can be quite brisk too, with certain versions achieving 0-100 km/h in just 7.8 seconds.

In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 is equipped primarily with petrol MHEV engines, providing a maximum power output of 186 HP. The CX-30 offers both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options as well. Its fuel efficiency is competitive, with consumption ranging from 5.7 to around 6.6 L/100km. The performance is commendable as well, with the top variants achieving 0-100 km/h in as quick as 8.3 seconds, underlining its sporty character.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Technology and Innovations

The Hyundai Kona comes loaded with the latest technology, featuring a user-friendly infotainment system that includes a touchscreen display, smartphone integration, and various connectivity options. Additionally, advanced safety features such as lane-keeping assist, adaptive cruise control, and a rearview camera enhance the driving experience.

Moreover, the Kona’s hybrid and electric variants introduce an innovative battery management system aimed at maximizing efficiency and minimizing emissions. The electric models also boast a fast-charging capability, making them practical for longer journeys.

Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 focuses on driver engagement with its state-of-the-art infotainment system, intuitive controls, and premium audio options. It also prioritizes safety, offering advanced safety features like blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert. The Mazda Connect system enhances connectivity, and the car's built quality further reflects attention to detail and craftsmanship.

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Conclusion

Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and Mazda CX-30 ultimately depends on your personal preferences and driving needs. The Kona stands out for its versatility with various powertrains, including electric options, as well as spacious cargo capacity. In contrast, the CX-30 excels in delivering a refined driving experience with its stylish design and focus on driver engagement.

Both vehicles embody the growing demand for practical yet sophisticated compact SUVs, making either choice a worthwhile investment. Whether you prioritize innovative technology, performance, or practicality, both the Hyundai Kona and Mazda CX-30 offer compelling reasons to be considered your next vehicle.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Hyundai Kona has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 2177 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Hyundai Kona manages with 4.60 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 1.10 L per 100 km.

Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona has a a bit edge – offering 218 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 32 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Hyundai Kona performs minimal better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Hyundai Kona pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 265 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Hyundai Kona is barely noticeable lighter – 1370 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 85 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers minimal more room – 466 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 36 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs slight better – up to 1406 L, which is about 106 L more than the Hyundai Kona.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 slight takes the win – 496 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Hyundai Kona proves to be wins solidly and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Hyundai Kona is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £23,100
Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company

Hyundai Kona

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 218 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.6 - 16.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 377 - 514 km
details

Hyundai Kona

5 (1)
rate

The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.

details
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-07_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-10_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-02_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company
hyundai-new-kona-and-kona-n-line-21_jpg @ Hyundai Motor Company

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Hyundai Kona serves up sharper handling, eye-catching design and punchier tech for drivers who want a bit of fun with their commute, while the Toyota Yaris Cross favours sensible virtues — class-leading hybrid economy, solid build and a more practical cabin for real-world family life. If you …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Hyundai Kona
Mazda CX-30
Kona @ Hyundai Motor Company
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
23100 - 41600 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1825 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
Height
1540 mm
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Bayon
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Bayon and Hyundai Kona each offer distinct advantages tailored to different driver preferences. The Bayon impresses with its sleek urban design and efficient use of space, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the Kona stands …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai i20
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Hyundai i20 and Hyundai Kona cater to different driving experiences, yet both deliver exceptional value. The Hyundai i20 shines with its compact design and fuel efficiency, making it an ideal city car, while the Hyundai Kona offers a more robust and versatile ride, …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona and Skoda Elroq stand out with their distinct design and performance capabilities. The Kona impresses with its dynamic styling and tech-forward interior, appealing to younger buyers, while the Elroq offers a spacious cabin and practical …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai i30 Wagon
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Hyundai i30 Wagon and Hyundai Kona compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Explorer EV
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In the battle of electric versatility, the Ford Explorer EV outshines with its spacious interior and impressive towing capacity, making it an ideal choice for families and adventurers alike. Conversely, the Hyundai Kona offers a nimble driving experience and a more compact design, perfect for urban …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Symbioz
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona stands out with its bold design and advanced technology features, offering drivers a dynamic and engaging driving experience. In contrast, the Renault Symbioz takes a more futuristic approach, emphasizing sustainability and autonomous driving …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Ford Puma takes on the Hyundai Kona, two standout competitors in the crossover segment. The Puma impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, while the Kona offers a more tech-savvy interior and a range of efficient powertrains. Ultimately, both …
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.