Compare performance (218 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23100 £ vs 26400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or VW T-Roc?
As the compact SUV segment continues to grow in popularity, two strong contenders stand out: the Hyundai Kona and the Volkswagen T-Roc. Both models bring their own unique blend of style, technology, and performance to the table. In this article, we take a closer look at their technical specifications and innovations to see how they compare.
The Hyundai Kona offers a versatile lineup that includes petrol, full hybrid, and electric engines. With power outputs ranging from 100 to 218 HP, it caters to a wide range of driving preferences. The electric variant boasts an impressive range of up to 514 km on a single charge, along with a top speed of 201 km/h. Meanwhile, the T-Roc is more limited with petrol and diesel options, providing performance from 115 to a robust 300 HP, with a maximum speed reaching up to 250 km/h.
Acceleration is a noteworthy aspect for both vehicles. The Kona's fastest variant can reach highway speeds in just 7.8 seconds, while the T-Roc impressive performance cars can do this in as little as 4.9 seconds. This indicates that performance enthusiasts may gravitate more towards the T-Roc, while those seeking efficiency might prefer the Kona.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, both models showcase attractive consumption rates. The Kona achieves between 4.5 to 6.7 L/100 km, depending on the engine type. The T-Roc, conversely, records slightly higher consumption rates, ranging from 4.7 to 8.5 L/100 km. The Kona's electric model performs exceptionally well with a consumption of 14.6 kWh/100 km, affirming its ecological credentials, especially in urban settings.
Space is a key factor in the SUV category, and both the Kona and T-Roc are designed with practicality in mind. The Hyundai Kona offers a trunk capacity of 466 liters, significantly larger than the T-Roc's maximum of 445 liters. Both vehicles comfortably seat five, but the Kona’s spacious interior is particularly appealing for families and travelers alike.
The Kona prides itself on its technological advancements with features like a fully digital cockpit, advanced connectivity options, and an intuitive infotainment system that seamlessly incorporates smartphone integration. Hyundai provides a suite of safety technologies, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, enhancing driver confidence.
The T-Roc also excels in technology, with its state-of-the-art infotainment system and optional features like the digital cockpit, which can be tailored according to the driver’s preferences. VW has made strides in offering innovative driver assistance systems that can make driving safer and easier.
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and Volkswagen T-Roc ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities. The Kona exhibits outstanding efficiency, versatility, and a strong focus on eco-friendliness, making it a prime choice for the environmentally conscious driver. On the other hand, the T-Roc offers powerful performance and advanced technology that appeals to those who crave dynamic driving experiences.
Both vehicles stand strong in their respective corners, ensuring drivers will have plenty of compelling options to consider in the compact SUV market.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Hyundai Kona has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3381 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Hyundai Kona manages with 4.60 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona has a distinct edge – offering 218 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Hyundai Kona pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 265 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Hyundai Kona is barely noticeable lighter – 1370 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 95 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers distinct more room – 466 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 182 L.
When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc hardly perceptible takes the win – 515 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
The Hyundai Kona is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23100 - 41600 £
|
Price
26400 - 38600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
48.4 - 65.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
|
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
|
Length
4355 - 4385 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
|
|
Height
1580 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
162 - 172 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
VW
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España