Compare performance (204 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,100 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or VW T-Roc?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
As the compact SUV segment continues to grow in popularity, two strong contenders stand out: the Hyundai Kona and the Volkswagen T-Roc. Both models bring their own unique blend of style, technology, and performance to the table. In this article, we take a closer look at their technical specifications and innovations to see how they compare.
The Hyundai Kona offers a versatile lineup that includes petrol, full hybrid, and electric engines. With power outputs ranging from 100 to 218 HP, it caters to a wide range of driving preferences. The electric variant boasts an impressive range of up to 514 km on a single charge, along with a top speed of 201 km/h. Meanwhile, the T-Roc is more limited with petrol and diesel options, providing performance from 115 to a robust 300 HP, with a maximum speed reaching up to 250 km/h.
Acceleration is a noteworthy aspect for both vehicles. The Kona's fastest variant can reach highway speeds in just 7.8 seconds, while the T-Roc impressive performance cars can do this in as little as 4.9 seconds. This indicates that performance enthusiasts may gravitate more towards the T-Roc, while those seeking efficiency might prefer the Kona.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, both models showcase attractive consumption rates. The Kona achieves between 4.5 to 6.7 L/100 km, depending on the engine type. The T-Roc, conversely, records slightly higher consumption rates, ranging from 4.7 to 8.5 L/100 km. The Kona's electric model performs exceptionally well with a consumption of 14.6 kWh/100 km, affirming its ecological credentials, especially in urban settings.
Space is a key factor in the SUV category, and both the Kona and T-Roc are designed with practicality in mind. The Hyundai Kona offers a trunk capacity of 466 liters, significantly larger than the T-Roc's maximum of 445 liters. Both vehicles comfortably seat five, but the Kona’s spacious interior is particularly appealing for families and travelers alike.
The Kona prides itself on its technological advancements with features like a fully digital cockpit, advanced connectivity options, and an intuitive infotainment system that seamlessly incorporates smartphone integration. Hyundai provides a suite of safety technologies, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, enhancing driver confidence.
The T-Roc also excels in technology, with its state-of-the-art infotainment system and optional features like the digital cockpit, which can be tailored according to the driver’s preferences. VW has made strides in offering innovative driver assistance systems that can make driving safer and easier.
Choosing between the Hyundai Kona and Volkswagen T-Roc ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities. The Kona exhibits outstanding efficiency, versatility, and a strong focus on eco-friendliness, making it a prime choice for the environmentally conscious driver. On the other hand, the T-Roc offers powerful performance and advanced technology that appeals to those who crave dynamic driving experiences.
Both vehicles stand strong in their respective corners, ensuring drivers will have plenty of compelling options to consider in the compact SUV market.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Hyundai Kona is slightly cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,381 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Hyundai Kona uses 4.6 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Hyundai Kona offers clearly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 54 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hyundai Kona is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai Kona delivers barely more torque with 265 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Kona is very slightly lighter – 1,370 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 95 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Hyundai Kona offers markedly more boot space – 466 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 182 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries very slightly more – 515 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
The Hyundai Kona stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
The VW T‑Roc feels noticeably more grown‑up than before, with a much nicer cabin, sensible physical controls and a calm, well‑insulated ride that makes long trips comfortable. It’s compact and city‑friendly with practical rear seating, but the sloping roofline reduces rear headroom and tempting options can quickly push the price up, so buyers after maximum space or a sporty feel may want to consider alternatives.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,100 - 41,900 £
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España